----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3513/#review4909 -----------------------------------------------------------
don't think it's the right approach. we should probably have easing curve support for our animations that are directly qabstractanimations - Marco On 2010-04-07 14:56:43, Bruno Abinader wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3513/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2010-04-07 14:56:43) > > > Review request for Plasma, igorto and Adenilson Cavalcanti. > > > Summary > ------- > > A new property "isBounceable" is added to the Rotation animation, which > causes the target widget to "bounce" on a range between (-angle()/2, > angle()/2). A static number of steps is defined by default (10 steps), > causing the bounce angle to decrease through the animation steps. Notice that > this effect doesn't behaves properly when the animation is part of a group, > falling back to the "non-bounceable" behavior when it is part of a group. > > > Diffs > ----- > > trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/animations/rotation_p.h 1111462 > trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/animations/rotation.cpp 1111462 > > Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3513/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > Tests have been made for different angles/axis on an additional example > button on the animation plasmoid example. This example code is not yet > release, but I can kindly pastebin it if needed. > > > Thanks, > > Bruno > > _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
