Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > plasma/activityrunner/aseigo > > kwin/coding-style/graesslin/ > > plasma-mobile/awesomeness/notmart (no, not a real branch ;) > > kdm/plasma-frontend/sreich (not real either, but could be)

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > plasma/activityrunner/aseigo > kwin/coding-style/graesslin/ > plasma-mobile/awesomeness/notmart (no, not a real branch ;) > kdm/plasma-frontend/sreich (not real either, but could be) > > it makes for branches names that are a bit long, but it

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > it makes for branches names that are a bit long, but it gives all the info > needed at a glance and orders things nicely together. tab completion makes > length a non-issue ime. > > thoughts? +1 just had done one without plasma/ a bit ago..

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Ivan Cukic
On Wednesday, 2. February 2011. 12.41.42 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > in any case, i just pushed a new feature branch to kde-workspace: > > aseigo/activityrunner ... just as Martin did with the kwin branches, > > i've > > after some discussion on

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Tuesday, February 1, 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > in any case, i just pushed a new feature branch to kde-workspace: > aseigo/activityrunner ... just as Martin did with the kwin branches, i've after some discussion on k-c-d, one idea from the calligra team is to preface the branch name with th

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, Ivan Čukić wrote: > I might be missing something, though. so far, i don't think you are :) -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks sig

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Ivan Čukić
I'm not really familiarized with Git yet, but I think that personal clones are a bit too much. Those are ok when contributors are from outside of the core-devel team and have no push rights on the master, but I don't think it is needed for most of us. I might be missing something, though. -- C

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011, Marco Martin wrote: > atm is a normal remote branch of master? not a clone? yes; my fear of clones is that we'll end up with a dozen different clones with various branches in them and it'll be painful to keep track of them all as people come and go. unless someon

Re: feature/topic branches; activities runner

2011-02-02 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hi all... > > huzzah for the new git, huh? ok.. so ... feature branches. there is going > to be an irc meeting, probably the weekend after next, about the workflow > for kdelibs and kde-runtime. i hope we will be able to use that for > kde-wor