---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125050/
---
(Updated Sept. 4, 2015, 9:54 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
> On Sept. 4, 2015, 9:44 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > patch looks good, but why are you in the else branch of
> > if(X11_Xcursor_FOUND)
> >
> > ?
> >
> > You want to fix that on the packaging side rather than having this patch
>
> Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN wrote:
> I'm working on the baloo
> On Sept. 4, 2015, 6:44 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > patch looks good, but why are you in the else branch of
> > if(X11_Xcursor_FOUND)
> >
> > ?
> >
> > You want to fix that on the packaging side rather than having this patch
>
> Ovidiu-Florin BOGDAN wrote:
> I'm working on the baloo
> On Sept. 4, 2015, 9:44 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> > patch looks good, but why are you in the else branch of
> > if(X11_Xcursor_FOUND)
> >
> > ?
> >
> > You want to fix that on the packaging side rather than having this patch
I'm working on the baloo KCM, and this stopped me from compilin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125050/#review84846
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Sept. 4, 2015, 6:42
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125050/#review84845
---
patch looks good, but why are you in the else branch of
if(X11
