Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

> On 2008-09-07 17:47:46, Aaron Seigo wrote: > > Hello Aaron, I don't have svn account to commit this patch could you commit it thanks - michal --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolba

Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/163/#review170 --- Ship it! - Aaron On 2008-09-07 17:01:46, michal seben wrote: >

Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

> On 2008-09-04 12:31:00, Aaron Seigo wrote: > > thank you Aaron for reply, I made changes again as you wish :) I hope now it's without mistakes - michal --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboar

Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/163/ --- (Updated 2008-09-07 17:01:46.209501) Review request for Plasma. Summary -

Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/163/#review145 --- trunk/KDE/kdeplasma-addons/applets/fileWatcher/fileWatcher.cpp

Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

> On 2008-08-27 16:24:38, Aaron Seigo wrote: > > there are a few issues to do with setting the size in init() for instance, > > but other than that (and a handful of style issues) it looks ok. > > > > the configuration dialog really needs some love though. hi Aaron thank for reply and time, I

Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/163/ --- (Updated 2008-08-29 07:37:19.114808) Review request for Plasma. Summary -

Re: Review Request: Auto resize of fileWatcher plasmoid

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/163/#review142 --- there are a few issues to do with setting the size in init() for i