+1
We haven't had any new reports about icons breaking only on master, so it
seems all fine.*
David
On Friday 30 December 2016 16:00:27 Lindsay Roberts wrote:
> On 30 December 2016 at 15:26, Marco Martin wrote:
> > the patch you mean is https://phabricator.kde.org/D2986 ?
> >
> > I think it makes sense to backpport..
> > also, to me backporting to 5.8 is kindof special, becuase of its lts
> >
On 30 December 2016 at 15:26, Marco Martin wrote:
> the patch you mean is https://phabricator.kde.org/D2986 ?
>
> I think it makes sense to backpport..
> also, to me backporting to 5.8 is kindof special, becuase of its lts status.
> maybe something i would not consider fto backport for a normal r
On Friday 30 December 2016 22:04:19 Lindsay Roberts wrote:
> Have been in discussion about backporting a bug fix -
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356479 to 5.8.
>
> The only documentation I could find on backport policy was
> https://community.kde.org/Policies/Commit_Policy#Backport_bugfix
On Friday, December 30, 2016 10:04:19 PM UTC Lindsay Roberts wrote:
> Have been in discussion about backporting a bug fix -
> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356479 to 5.8.
>
> The only documentation I could find on backport policy was
> https://community.kde.org/Policies/Commit_Policy#Backpo
Have been in discussion about backporting a bug fix -
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356479 to 5.8.
The only documentation I could find on backport policy was
https://community.kde.org/Policies/Commit_Policy#Backport_bugfixes - which
is roughly as the URI implies: "backport bugfixes."
This
