Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-23 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:42:59PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > > > > that's subsurface next to the gallery example app how they look on my > laptop: > > http://imgur.com/Ni9fhkD > > > > note the size of the bottom action button and drawer h

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 21 April 2016 09:59:32 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:42:59PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > > that's subsurface next to the gallery example app how they look on my > > laptop: http://imgur.com/Ni9fhkD > > > > note the size of the bottom action button and drawer handle.

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 21 April 2016 10:02:32 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > I found a way to more or less fix it on Android: > > > > 1) disable any margin calculation for the case of android in > > ApplicationWindow.qml > > Is there anything I need to do there besides what you've already committed > to master? n

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:17:19PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > (1) the keyboard issue on both iOS and (maybe less so) Android. > > Sometimes the virtual keyboard opening is deteceted correctly and > > correct bottom margin is added,

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 05:28:28PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > > > (3) the ListView scrolling issue > > When scrolling a ListView it's very easy to get into a state where QML > > gets confused and part or all of the screen becomes background color > > and trying to scroll makes things

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:42:59PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > > that's subsurface next to the gallery example app how they look on my laptop: > http://imgur.com/Ni9fhkD > > note the size of the bottom action button and drawer handle.. that > looks pretty weird That's weird indeed. Any idea why

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > We set the font size based on preferences, IIRC - and we use the same > prefs for desktop and mobile (that's not just laziness - that allows me to > set up the proxy with the desktop version and then have the mobile version > built on the same

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > (1) the keyboard issue on both iOS and (maybe less so) Android. > Sometimes the virtual keyboard opening is deteceted correctly and > correct bottom margin is added, sometimes it isn't. So either we > compensate for the bug in Kiri

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 21 April 2016 07:42:52 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > (1) the keyboard issue on both iOS and (maybe less so) Android. > Sometimes the virtual keyboard opening is deteceted correctly and > correct bottom margin is added, sometimes it isn't. So either we > compensate for the bug in Kir

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:17:14PM +0200, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday 20 April 2016 09:41:15 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > We set the font size based on preferences, IIRC - and we use the same > > prefs for desktop and mobile (that's not just laziness - that allows me to > > set up the proxy w

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday 20 April 2016 09:41:15 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > We set the font size based on preferences, IIRC - and we use the same > prefs for desktop and mobile (that's not just laziness - that allows me to > set up the proxy with the desktop version and then have the mobile version > built on the sa

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-20 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 05:52:48PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 20 April 2016, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 April 2016 16:31:41 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > > > > 2.) On your Nexus 7, the whole thing indeed is way too small. This > > > > seems to be a DPI scaling issue, though

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-20 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 20 April 2016, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Tuesday 19 April 2016 16:31:41 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > > > 2.) On your Nexus 7, the whole thing indeed is way too small. This > > > seems to be a DPI scaling issue, though > > > > I've seen QScreen physical dots per inch reporting rubbish o

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday 19 April 2016 16:31:41 Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > > 2.) On your Nexus 7, the whole thing indeed is way too small. This seems > > to be a DPI scaling issue, though > I've seen QScreen physical dots per inch reporting rubbish on some Android > devices, I think Nexus 7 was even one of them. S

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-20 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Tuesday 19 April 2016 05:03:01 Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > Since it's not something that Kirigami was made for, I fear that at some > > point, it will just break, and it would neither be good if Kirigami had > > to > > adapt to Subsurface-mobile's specialties, nor if you had to work > > "against"

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 7:31 AM, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > >> 2.) On your Nexus 7, the whole thing indeed is way too small. This seems to >> be a DPI scaling issue, though > > I've seen QScreen physical dots per inch reporting rubbish on some Android > devices, I think Nexus 7 was even one of th

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
> 2.) On your Nexus 7, the whole thing indeed is way too small. This seems to > be a DPI scaling issue, though I've seen QScreen physical dots per inch reporting rubbish on some Android devices, I think Nexus 7 was even one of them. See my comment in QTBUG-35701 for a workaround (basically aski

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On Dienstag, 19. April 2016 05:26:35 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> On Apr 19, 2016, at 5:12 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> >>> So I've played with this on my phone and I'm not super excited with how >>> close the actions are together. Can y

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 5:33 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> This is an old Nexus 7; if I have my index finger hovering over the button >> it easily covers all three icons; yes, I can make it hit the right part of >> the button, but boy does that feel "

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 19 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > This is an old Nexus 7; if I have my index finger hovering over the button > it easily covers all three icons; yes, I can make it hit the right part of > the button, but boy does that feel "tight". very tiny indeed :) -- Marco Martin _

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 2:01 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Monday 18 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> When Sebastian and I first talked about using the "mobile components" for >> Subsurface-mobile I explicitly agreed that I was happy with this being a >> bit of "learning by doing" and at least

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:54:10PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > As I go through our sources I notice that for Subsurface-mobile the new > > syntax isn't really better (but that's because we do weird things with pages > > that have multiple states). That isn't to say that I suddenly no lon

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Dienstag, 19. April 2016 04:39:34 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:19 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 19 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > >>> the look and behavior of buttons can be tested and adjusted (that > >>> shouldn't involve further API changes), as the cu

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:45 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> would be cool :) >> >> As I go through our sources I notice that for Subsurface-mobile the new >> syntax isn't really better (but that's because we do weird things with >> pages that have mu

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 19 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > would be cool :) > > As I go through our sources I notice that for Subsurface-mobile the new > syntax isn't really better (but that's because we do weird things with > pages that have multiple states). That isn't to say that I suddenly no > longer

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:19 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Tuesday 19 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >>> the look and behavior of buttons can be tested and adjusted (that >>> shouldn't involve further API changes), as the current implementaton >>> indeed is a bit cramped making side buttons dif

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 19 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > the look and behavior of buttons can be tested and adjusted (that > > shouldn't involve further API changes), as the current implementaton > > indeed is a bit cramped making side buttons difficult to hit > > I take this to mean that you'd like me

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Dirk Hohndel
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 2:01 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Monday 18 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> When Sebastian and I first talked about using the "mobile components" for >> Subsurface-mobile I explicitly agreed that I was happy with this being a >> bit of "learning by doing" and at least

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-19 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 18 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > When Sebastian and I first talked about using the "mobile components" for > Subsurface-mobile I explicitly agreed that I was happy with this being a > bit of "learning by doing" and at least initially being a moving target. > > I guess I was confused

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-18 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:07:32PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 18 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > Cute. I like it. Just make sure that I can use variables to assign to this > > as the available buttons will change depending on context for us. > > > > Switching to a new API isn't rea

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-18 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 18 April 2016, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > Cute. I like it. Just make sure that I can use variables to assign to this > as the available buttons will change depending on context for us. > > Switching to a new API isn't really a big deal for us. I build all the > binaries and we already have th

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-18 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Montag, 18. April 2016 11:28:04 CEST Dirk Hohndel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:29:43PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > one thing that as i understood was needed in the mobile UI of Subsurface, > > is the possibility to add other buttons in the action buttons at the > > bot

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-18 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:29:43PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > Hi all, > > one thing that as i understood was needed in the mobile UI of Subsurface, is > the possibility to add other buttons in the action buttons at the bottom. > here's how my prototype looks like: http://imgur.com/VTHbDBJ Hmm.

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-18 Thread kainz.a
Webbrowser: new tab, edit url, top page Image viewer: export, edit, Am 18.04.2016 19:34 schrieb "Kai Uwe Broulik" : > I like that, also the compact look. > > In an Email app when reading a mail for example the main button would be > "reply" , the right one "forward" and the left one "reply all" or

Re: Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-18 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
I like that, also the compact look. In an Email app when reading a mail for example the main button would be "reply" , the right one "forward" and the left one "reply all" or "archive". The less important action would be in the context drawer.   Ursprüngliche Nachricht   Von:notm...@gmail.com

Kirigami: a feature needed for subsurface and api change feedback

2016-04-18 Thread Marco Martin
Hi all, one thing that as i understood was needed in the mobile UI of Subsurface, is the possibility to add other buttons in the action buttons at the bottom. here's how my prototype looks like: http://imgur.com/VTHbDBJ From discussions with the designers, it seems it should be always limited to