On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 01:54:10PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > > > As I go through our sources I notice that for Subsurface-mobile the new > > syntax isn't really better (but that's because we do weird things with pages > > that have multiple states). That isn't to say that I suddenly no longer > > like the new syntax - it's just an observation. > > Have you tried looking into possible ways you could get rid of these "weird > things with pages that have multiple states"?
Hehe... so this is the underlying structure that Sebastian had initially implemented... there's a certain amount of worry on my part to mess with that too much :-) > Since it's not something that Kirigami was made for, I fear that at some > point, it will just break, and it would neither be good if Kirigami had to > adapt to Subsurface-mobile's specialties, nor if you had to work "against" > Kirigami. No such intention here. I know that Sebastian and Marco worked on this initial implementation together (quite a while ago by now). It works. It doesn't seem to break things. I wouldn't be surprised if all this could be done better, but I don't feel competent to judge that. > Maybe the fact that you are doing these "weird things" points to an important > pattern which Kirigami is missing and should be added in a proper way. Sebastian, can you comment on that? /D _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
