On Thursday 23 October 2014 13:20:06 David Edmundson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:33 AM, David Faure wrote:
> > On Monday 20 October 2014 02:52:58 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > >Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
> > >
> > > a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:33 AM, David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 20 October 2014 02:52:58 David Edmundson wrote:
> > >Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
> >
> > a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c
>
That doesn't make sense, that commit is from September 15 and
On Monday 20 October 2014 02:52:58 David Edmundson wrote:
> >Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
>
> a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c
That doesn't make sense, that commit is from September 15 and is already in
5.3.0.
PS: please CC me for urgent requests...
>Give me the sha1 to cherry-pick and I'll make a 5.3.1 with it.
a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 22:17:38 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2014, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > I need approval from Marco and other David.
> >
> > after a quick chat with David E this morning, I would revert that patch
> > (and then remove the plugin in plasma-workspace master)
> >
On Monday 13 October 2014, Marco Martin wrote:
> > I need approval from Marco and other David.
>
> after a quick chat with David E this morning, I would revert that patch
> (and then remove the plugin in plasma-workspace master)
> *but* this only if there will be a 5.3.1 (there should be a fix in
On Monday 13 of October 2014 13:07:35 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Sunday 12 October 2014, David Edmundson wrote:
> > On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
> > > On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
>
On Sunday 12 October 2014, David Edmundson wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
>
> how we
>
> > > > proceed.
> > > >
> > > > Reverting a39328433
On Sunday 12 October 2014, David Edmundson wrote:
> > >
> > > Assuming we don't have a time machine our options are:
> > > - revert this commit and release plasma-framework 5.3.1 really quickly
> >
> > Please go with this option...
>
> I need approval from Marco and other David.
>
> David
eh
On Sunday 12 October 2014 20:48:36 David Edmundson wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
>
> how we
>
> > > > proceed.
> > > >
> > > > Reverting a
On 12 Oct 2014 18:04, "šumski" wrote:
>
> On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out
how we
> > > proceed.
> > >
> > > Reverting a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c does indeed make
> >
> > everything w
On Sunday 12 of October 2014 11:58:44 David Edmundson wrote:
> > I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out how we
> > proceed.
> >
> > Reverting a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c does indeed make
>
> everything work.
>
> Assuming we don't have a time machine our o
>
>
> I'll report back when I've confirmed this and then we can work out how we
> proceed.
>
> Reverting a3932843386a29faa3c62bf2934a173a3781d56c does indeed make
everything work.
Assuming we don't have a time machine our options are:
- revert this commit and release plasma-framework 5.3.1 really
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 8:10 PM, David Faure wrote:
> On Friday 10 October 2014 16:24:52 David Edmundson wrote:
> > Packagers,
> >
> > It seems Plasma 5.0 does NOT run smoothly against Plasma Framework 5.3.
> >
> > It would be easiest if distros hold off shipping frameworks 5.3 until
> > Plasma 5
14 matches
Mail list logo
