On Monday 15 December 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > if you want to commit it no problem,
>
> Ok, committed, so whatever you want to change, feel free :)
>
> Cheerio
>
> BTW, I just noticed the getter for the prefix is
> QString prefix()
> while the setter(s) is (are)
>void elementPrefix(...)
> if you want to commit it no problem,
Ok, committed, so whatever you want to change, feel free :)
Cheerio
BTW, I just noticed the getter for the prefix is
QString prefix()
while the setter(s) is (are)
void elementPrefix(...)
:( too late for that?
--
Money can't buy happiness, but neith
On Monday 15 December 2008, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> On Monday, 15. December 2008. 3.39.07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 December 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > speaking with fredrikh about speed with window masks some things have
> > > emerged: returning a qbitmap is a bit wrong
On Monday, 15. December 2008. 3.39.07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday 14 December 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > speaking with fredrikh about speed with window masks some things have
> > emerged: returning a qbitmap is a bit wrong, since it will have to be
> > converted to a qregion ea
On Sunday 14 December 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
> speaking with fredrikh about speed with window masks some things have
> emerged: returning a qbitmap is a bit wrong, since it will have to be
> converted to a qregion each time, so..
> should the framesvg mask function return a qregion? th
Hi all,
speaking with fredrikh about speed with window masks some things have emerged:
returning a qbitmap is a bit wrong, since it will have to be converted to a
qregion each time, so..
should the framesvg mask function return a qregion? this would of course break
the api, so quite of a problem