On Friday 12 September 2008 16:16:05 Marco Martin wrote:
> it always remain the second problemof the crash on add:
> it seem to happen only when there is a proxywidget in the extenderitem
> (aah, qt bug? deletelater crashes for proxywidgets perhaps?)
> if there is a normal graphicswidget like a pla
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Thursday 11 September 2008 17:06:10 Marco Martin wrote:
> > with furter investigation i've found that it doesn't crash anymore if i
> > remove line 194 of applet.cpp
> > //destroy temporary extender items, or items that aren't detached, s
On Thursday 11 September 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Thursday 11 September 2008 17:06:10 Marco Martin wrote:
> > with furter investigation i've found that it doesn't crash anymore if i
> > remove line 194 of applet.cpp
> > //destroy temporary extender items, or items that aren't detached, s
On Thursday 11 September 2008 17:06:10 Marco Martin wrote:
> with furter investigation i've found that it doesn't crash anymore if i
> remove line 194 of applet.cpp
> //destroy temporary extender items, or items that aren't detached, so
> their //configuration won't linger after a plasma restart.
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 September 2008 15:02:23 Marco Martin wrote:
> > > another problem:
> > > adding a clock on the desktop when plasma is already started produces a
> > > crash, at line 389
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 16:52:17 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> popupIcon?
you already proposed that two messages ago.
-Riccardo
--
GPG key:
3D0F6376
When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey:
9EBD7FE1
-
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasiti Lapé Hetep M
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > > have popu
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 September 2008 15:02:23 Marco Martin wrote:
> > another problem:
> > adding a clock on the desktop when plasma is already started produces a
> > crash, at line 389 of extenderitem.cpp widget->setParentItem(this);
> > don't und
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 15:02:23 Marco Martin wrote:
> another problem:
> adding a clock on the desktop when plasma is already started produces a
> crash, at line 389 of extenderitem.cpp widget->setParentItem(this);
> don't understand why just setting a parent item would crash :-/
> instead
On Wednesday 10 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > have popupapplet support a null icon being passed into setIcon, which
>
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > have popupapplet support a null icon being passed into setIcon, which
> > > will cause it to kill it's own icon. at that point, you a
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > have popupapplet support a null icon being passed into setIcon, which
> > will cause it to kill it's own icon. at that point, you are quite free to
> > reimplement paintInterface or instant
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>needed in
> practice. in fact, the simplicity is *THE primary feature*.
>
> as a team, we end up in this same sort of discussion for nearly every bit
> of the API that we spend too much time with. why? we become comfortable
> with the API, master
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 18:24:17 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > i see like two different things, like an applet that Has a
> > popup vs popupapplet that is an applet that Is a popup
>
> which is provided for in my proposed patch.
>
> has a popup:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/145/
> > > and corresponding thread on this list with subject:
> > > "Review Request: PopupApple
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/145/
> > and corresponding thread on this list with subject:
> > "Review Request: PopupApplet iconify patch"
>
> because people will make the wrong deci
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:26:34 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > have popupapplet support a null icon being passed into setIcon, which
> > > will cause it to kill it's own icon. at that poin
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 16:56:11 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/145/
> > and corresponding thread on this list with subject:
> > "Review Request: PopupApplet iconify patch"
>
> because people will make the w
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 16:56:11 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> because people will make the wrong decisions. in the submission for 145 it
> says:
>
> " For example kickoff's is always shown when put in the desktop while it
> would be nicer to have it "iconified" as it happens in the panel."
>
> like
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > have popupapplet support a null icon being passed into setIcon, which
> > will cause it to kill it's own icon. at that point, you are quite free to
> > reimplement paintInterface or instant
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> have popupapplet support a null icon being passed into setIcon, which will
> cause it to kill it's own icon. at that point, you are quite free to
> reimplement paintInterface or instantiate your widget.
something like the completely untested pa
On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> http://reviewboard.vidsolbach.de/r/145/
> and corresponding thread on this list with subject:
> "Review Request: PopupApplet iconify patch"
because people will make the wrong decisions. in the submission for 145 it
says:
" For example kicko
Hi Rob,
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 12:00:29 Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008 09:14:51 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 September 2008 02:26:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Monday 08 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > > in popupapplet adding the possibility
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 09:14:51 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 September 2008 02:26:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Monday 08 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > in popupapplet adding the possibility ti replace the icon with a
> > > generic QGraphicsWidget
I agree, if we make
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 02:26:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday 08 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> > in popupapplet adding the possibility ti replace the icon with a generic
> > QGraphicsWidget
>
> this probably makes sense. the question would be how to make a nice API for
> it.
>
> t
On Monday 08 September 2008, Marco Martin wrote:
> in popupapplet adding the possibility ti replace the icon with a generic
> QGraphicsWidget
this probably makes sense. the question would be how to make a nice API for
it.
there will *still* be cases where this fails and some code will need to be
On Monday 08 September 2008 22:18:38 Marco Martin wrote:
> looked at it and talking with ruphy on a possible popupapplet extension
> made me think about it so now i have a big doubt... :)
Precisely +1 ;-)
-Riccardo
--
GPG key:
3D0F6376
When encrypting, please encrypt also for this subkey:
9EBD7F
On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Rob Scheepmaker wrote:
> I've recently written a simple Extender tutorial on techbase, and would
> appreciate some feedback. Is the example clear? Is there stuff I don't
> mention but should? You can find the tutorial on
>
> http://tec
I've recently written a simple Extender tutorial on techbase, and would
appreciate some feedback. Is the example clear? Is there stuff I don't mention
but should? You can find the tutorial on
http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Plasma/UsingExtenders
Regards,
Rob Scheepma
29 matches
Mail list logo
