On September 30, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On September 29, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Keep in mind that the
> binary is started on demand, so it does not take any memory if you are
> not using it (assuming it would automatically stop itself after a
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On September 29, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Keep in mind that the
binary is started on demand, so it does not take any memory if you are
not using it (assuming it would automatically stop itself after a
while).
>>> Same goes for applets, dataengines...
On September 29, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >> Keep in mind that the
> >> binary is started on demand, so it does not take any memory if you are
> >> not using it (assuming it would automatically stop itself after a
> >> while).
> >
> > Same goes for applets, dataengines...
>
> Can an applet u
Hey Aurélien,
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 10:52:55 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Monday 28 September 2009 17:01:34 Roderick B. Greening wrote:
> >> I wonder if it would be worthwhile for Sebastian and Aurelien to get
> >> together and chat offline. I see some opportu
On Tuesday 29 September 2009 10:34:19 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> >> Regarding implementing it as a separate applet: I don't think it would
> >> have been a good idea because you would have to either add a dumb icon
> >> to your panel so that you could run this system, or a
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday 28 September 2009 17:01:34 Roderick B. Greening wrote:
>> I wonder if it would be worthwhile for Sebastian and Aurelien to get
>> together and chat offline. I see some opportunity for clarification in a
>> one-on-one via irc, etc.
>
> Not sure, it sounds li
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>> Regarding implementing it as a separate applet: I don't think it would
>> have been a good idea because you would have to either add a dumb icon
>> to your panel so that you could run this system, or add an invisible
>> applet (not handy for the user to manipulate).
>
> On Monday 28 September 2009 17:01:34 Roderick B. Greening wrote:
> > I wonder if it would be worthwhile for Sebastian and Aurelien to get
> > together and chat offline. I see some opportunity for clarification in
> > a one-on-one via irc, etc.
>
> Not sure, it sounds like you see personal is
On Monday 28 September 2009 17:01:34 Roderick B. Greening wrote:
> I wonder if it would be worthwhile for Sebastian and Aurelien to get
> together and chat offline. I see some opportunity for clarification in a
> one-on-one via irc, etc.
Not sure, it sounds like you see personal issues betwee
I wonder if it would be worthwhile for Sebastian and Aurelien to get together
and chat offline. I see some opportunity for clarification in a one-on-one via
irc, etc.
I believe we had some great discussions at UDS and Sebastian was awesome at
helping provide guidance to Aurelien at the time. H
On Monday 28 September 2009 15:03:05 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 September 2009 09:16:25 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> >>> On September 23, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> > On September 23, 2009, Marco
Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Thursday 24 September 2009 09:16:25 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>>> On September 23, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> On September 23, 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
>> every other consideration aside, i feel that it wo
On Thursday 24 September 2009 09:16:25 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On September 23, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> >> Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> >>> On September 23, 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
> every other consideration aside, i feel that it would have been -far-
>
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On September 23, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
>> Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
>>> On September 23, 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
every other consideration aside, i feel that it would have been -far-
easier to mantain if the systray patch just consisted in notifications
>>
On September 23, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> > On September 23, 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
> >> every other consideration aside, i feel that it would have been -far-
> >> easier to mantain if the systray patch just consisted in notifications
> >> disabling and provide
Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
> On September 23, 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
>> every other consideration aside, i feel that it would have been -far-
>> easier to mantain if the systray patch just consisted in notifications
>> disabling and provide a totally separate daemon for that kind of
>> notifica
On September 23, 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
> every other consideration aside, i feel that it would have been -far-
> easier to mantain if the systray patch just consisted in notifications
> disabling and provide a totally separate daemon for that kind of
> notifications
unless i'm misrememberin
On September 23, 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > before this gets carried forward into a big thread on this list, it has
> > been made very clear that Canonical is intent on following through on
> > these ideas as they are. it is an insular project without outside
> > par
> it in a blog post or a Kubuntu review.
>
> This work provides an implementation of Ayatana notifications for Plasma
> (Ayatana is the name of a Canonical project to improve user experience
> on Ubuntu and derivatives). Ayatana notifications have the following
> characteristics:
every
Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On September 23, 2009, Dario Freddi wrote:
>> presented as "your initiative" regardless of Ayatana. However, with Ayatana
>> notifications user interaction is not possible, hence your previous patch
>> was either an unfortunate wrong timing coincidence or strictly related.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On September 23, 2009, Dario Freddi wrote:
>> presented as "your initiative" regardless of Ayatana. However, with Ayatana
>> notifications user interaction is not possible, hence your previous patch
>> was either an unfortunate wrong timing
Dario Freddi wrote:
> I'd like a bit more clarity. The patch you posted about powerdevil was
> presented as "your initiative" regardless of Ayatana. However, with Ayatana
> notifications user interaction is not possible, hence your previous patch was
> either an unfortunate wrong timing coincide
On September 23, 2009, Dario Freddi wrote:
> presented as "your initiative" regardless of Ayatana. However, with Ayatana
> notifications user interaction is not possible, hence your previous patch
> was either an unfortunate wrong timing coincidence or strictly related.
of course it is strictly r
Am Mittwoch 23 September 2009 18:50:41 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau:
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> >>> Why should a user switch to something else than the KDE notifications?
> >>> The dialog is completely missing any information on what the
> >>> notifications provide, what's the difference between the two
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>>> Why should a user switch to something else than the KDE notifications?
>>> The dialog is completely missing any information on what the
>>> notifications provide, what's the difference between the two and in the
>>> end it will come down to the one provides different possi
Am Mittwoch 23 September 2009 18:21:32 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau:
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> >> An important point: While the patch is integrated in Kubuntu, the
> >> default behavior is to use KDE notifications. The user can switch to
> >> Ayatana notifications through an option of the system tray co
, but I'd just like to have some clarifications on purpose and goals.
That said.
>
> This work provides an implementation of Ayatana notifications for Plasma
> (Ayatana is the name of a Canonical project to improve user experience
> on Ubuntu and derivatives). Ayatana notificat
Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>> An important point: While the patch is integrated in Kubuntu, the
>> default behavior is to use KDE notifications. The user can switch to
>> Ayatana notifications through an option of the system tray configuration
>> dialog (there are even preview buttons to help the user
Am Mittwoch 23 September 2009 16:48:00 schrieb Aurélien Gâteau:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to present to you some work I have been doing for Canonical
> regarding notifications in Plasma.
That just saved you from a rant about it on planetkde from my side ;-) I
wanted to blog about some things I don't
gt; have a different position than Canonical on the subject of notifications.
> I decided to write this mail because I believe it is more correct to let
> you know about it in a more "personal" way rather than you discovering
> it in a blog post or a Kubuntu review.
>
> This w
Canonical on the subject of notifications.
I decided to write this mail because I believe it is more correct to let
you know about it in a more "personal" way rather than you discovering
it in a blog post or a Kubuntu review.
This work provides an implementation of Ayatana notifications
31 matches
Mail list logo
