> Nepomuk in 4.10 being too slow. Whichever bottlenecks they may be, are
> "most probably" in our code. Not theirs.
There are bottlenecks in nepomuk, but there are in V as well.
Once upon a time, I did some benchmarks with sql (sqlite) and sparql
(virtuoso/soprano) queries for the things that a
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> On Sunday, 17. February 2013. 12.20.00 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Sunday, February 17, 2013 08:55:38 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > > * which pulls in Virtuoso
>
> Just a small off-topic here: Virtuoso *is* one of the fastest rdf databases
> out
On Sunday, 17. February 2013. 12.20.00 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Sunday, February 17, 2013 08:55:38 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > * which pulls in Virtuoso
Just a small off-topic here: Virtuoso *is* one of the fastest rdf databases
out there. The problem is not that much with its speed, but more w
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 08:55:38 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> * which pulls in Virtuoso
afaict this is now the main problem. (which speak volumes to how far akonadi
and nepomuk have both come in the last 2 years!)
I was speaking with Georg from Kolab Systems the other day over coffee and this
On Sunday 17 February 2013 02:08:57 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, February 16, 2013 16:54:03 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > I wouldn't call KDE Plasma lightweight
>
> indeed; those 1Ghz ARM cpus with 512MB of RAM running it are just *beasts*
> of the modern age I tell you. ;)
>
> razorqt may
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 16:54:03 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> I wouldn't call KDE Plasma lightweight
indeed; those 1Ghz ARM cpus with 512MB of RAM running it are just *beasts* of
the modern age I tell you. ;)
razorqt may be lighter still (i haven't looked, but i can imagine all sorts of
wa
On Saturday, 2013-02-16, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> On Saturday 16 February 2013 18:55:17 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > All good points. From my side, they're totally welcome. (I'd need to know
> > in time in order to make space for them during the sprint.) Are you in
> > contact with the developers a
On Saturday 16 February 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> >
> > *Comments?*
>
> All good points. From my side, they're totally welcome. (I'd need to know
> in time in order to make space for them during the sprint.) Are you in
> contact with the developers already? Maybe in that case, you could ask
On Saturday 16 February 2013 18:55:17 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> All good points. From my side, they're totally welcome. (I'd need to know in
> time in order to make space for them during the sprint.) Are you in contact
> with the developers already? Maybe in that case, you could ask if they're
> in
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 16:54:03 Martin Graesslin wrote:
> I want to suggest that we invite Razor-Qt developers to our next Workspaces
> Sprint in Nuremberg.
>
> *Why?*
> At FOSDEM there was a presentation about Razor-Qt and I attended it
> together with many other KDE developers. For me
Hi all,
I want to suggest that we invite Razor-Qt developers to our next Workspaces
Sprint in Nuremberg.
*Why?*
At FOSDEM there was a presentation about Razor-Qt and I attended it together
with many other KDE developers. For me the most important information I took
out of that talk was that Ra
11 matches
Mail list logo
