On Saturday, February 16, 2013 16:54:03 Martin Graesslin wrote: > I wouldn't call KDE Plasma lightweight
indeed; those 1Ghz ARM cpus with 512MB of RAM running it are just *beasts* of the modern age I tell you. ;) razorqt may be lighter still (i haven't looked, but i can imagine all sorts of ways of making a lighter system), but let's keep some perspective here. > Personally I would like to get razor on the long road into the KDE > community. I would love to see razor being hosted on our infrastructure and hosting and sharing technology indeed makes sense. as Marco noted this next sprint is going to be focused on the libplasma-and- friends code, but as long as that isn't going to be completely uninteresting for them it'd be great to have some of razorqt devs there. > That is whenever a user complains about Plasma we can suggest > them to use razor. having a multiplicity of options for people to choose from is fine. ensuring that the messaging does not become confusing would need to be cared for, but that's not hard. that said, i'd also like to think we can address valid issues rather than just push them off to someone else's pile. -- Aaron J. Seigo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
