On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:47 +0100, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 February 2011, you wrote:
> >
> > Oh, I thought you meant to use "AccessibleDescription" as a suffix.
> >
> > I guess my concern with not having two is that it means when there is a
> > state change signal we've got to do a
Okay,
I think we're done discussing, so let me try and summarize to make sure
I understand (and everyone can correct me if not :)
* Adding a field "X-KDE-StatusNotifierItems" to track the IDs of
items in the desktop files was agreed upon. Other solutions
were talked about,
tthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ted Gould wrote on 08/02/11 20:23:
>...
> Do you have thoughts on this from the a11y perspective? They want to
> use the title of the tooltip for the accessible label. It seems to me
> that would be sub-optimal, but if
t my concern is more that they have a way to explicitly
provide which visualization that they're over-optimizing for.
--Ted
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 22:01 -0800, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, February 3, 2011, Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 09:19 -0800,
people who want to tweak specific visualizations
with known short term results should be possible.
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 10:43 -0800, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Thursday, February 3, 2011, Ted Gould wrote:
> > people wanting different menus on the panel vs. on the launcher.
>
>
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 16:24 +0100, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On the other hand, it requires application developers to add another
> string in their code to all UI elements -- something which might be
> easily forgotten by those that don't care a lot about a11y (I fear
> that this applies to a lot o
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 14:45 +0100, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2011, Ted Gould wrote:
> > We'd like to suggest an additional key for .desktop files that lists the
> > IDs of Status Notifier Items that an application exports. This will
> > allow us to b
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 14:41 +0100, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2011, Ted Gould wrote:
> > We also started to use some of the application indicators from
> > applications in the launcher on the left side of the screen. We use the
> > application indicator
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 14:37 +0100, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2011, Ted Gould wrote:
> > One of the projects we're doing is to try and make Unity more
> > accessible. To that end we'd like to add properties to add accessible
> > labels for t
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 14:27 +0100, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2011, Ted Gould wrote:
> > I'd like to propose some new properties to be added to the SNI interface
> > for a couple of projects in the Application Indicator framework that we
> > have over
Hello,
For an intro see the mail with the (0/3) in the subject line.
We'd like to suggest an additional key for .desktop files that lists the
IDs of Status Notifier Items that an application exports. This will
allow us to better match SNI items when we are using them as quicklists,
as errors are
Hello,
For an intro see the mail with the (0/3) in the subject line.
We also started to use some of the application indicators from
applications in the launcher on the left side of the screen. We use the
application indicator to provide additional menus for the launcher which
we call a quick lis
Hello,
I'd like to propose some new properties to be added to the SNI interface
for a couple of projects in the Application Indicator framework that we
have over here. We'd love it if you guys would consider adopting them
in the base spec. Also, if you have comments on how to make them better
I
Hello,
For an intro see the mail with the (0/3) in the subject line.
One of the projects we're doing is to try and make Unity more
accessible. To that end we'd like to add properties to add accessible
labels for the icons that could be given to screen readers. We're
planning on issuing warnings
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 12:26 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On August 10, 2010, Ted Gould wrote:
> > I think that's were we're coming at this from different positions, we
> > don't have another API for it.
>
> ah, i see. that is indeed problematic. so i&#x
(I just snipped everything else, because I agree this is the heart of
the matter)
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 11:21 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On August 10, 2010, Ted Gould wrote:
> > And to overlay text is also non-ideal because making
> > the text readable
> requires basically
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 09:40 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> i really think this is one of those places where we should draw a line in
> the sand and say "beyond this point, text doesn't happen, sorry." getting
> rid of textual data in the primary display of these items is a good thing,
> not a bad t
17 matches
Mail list logo
