Re: CI Utilisation and system efficiency

2025-04-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 3:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > When reviewing the list of CI builds projects have enabled, it is important > to consider to what degree your project benefits from having various builds > enabled. One common pattern i've seen is having Alpine, SUSE Qt 6.9 and SUSE > Qt

Re: Plasma 6.3 schedule

2024-10-19 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 12:09 PM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > We should schedule Plasma 6.3 > > I've made a proposal on my Google calendar here > https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0?cid=MDMxZ2tncWcxaGpmOGxjbWowZW0xZDJzajhAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbQ > > I can't find the notes from the s

Re: Plasm 6.1 Kickoff Meeting notes

2024-03-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 9:32 AM Nicolas Fella wrote: > > # Plasma 6.1 kickoff meeting notes > Hey sorry folks, I wasn't able to make it because I'm in California this week and that resulted in it being too early for me. > ## 6.0 retrospective > > Generally well received# Plasma 6.1 kickoff meeti

Re: more betas / shorter windows?

2023-12-23 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 2:22 PM Nate Graham wrote: > > Yeah, it's long been a problem that bugs reported towards the end of a > beta release were often fixed weeks ago, which wastes everyone's time. > Shorter betas would also help our most effective volunteer QA people who > close their bug report

Re: git-repositories-for-release

2023-11-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 11:21 AM Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Diff from 5.27 > -aura-browser > -aura-browser > +kactivities > +kactivities-stats > -khotkeys > -krdp > +kwayland > -plank-player > -plank-player > -plasma-bigscreen > +plasma-framework > -plasma-remotecontrollers > +plasma5support > +pr

Re: First round of feedback from Fedora 40 KDE Plasma 6 (Wayland-only) discussion

2023-10-30 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 8:11 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 8:53 AM Niels De Graef wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Thanks Neal for including me! > > > > Thanks for joining in the conversation! > > > (For the people w

Re: First round of feedback from Fedora 40 KDE Plasma 6 (Wayland-only) discussion

2023-09-24 Thread Neal Gompa
bit structured here. > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 6:45 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > So unless you've been living under a rock for the past week, you might > > have noticed a bunch of buzz about Fedora KDE proposing to drop the > > X11 ses

Re: First round of feedback from Fedora 40 KDE Plasma 6 (Wayland-only) discussion

2023-09-18 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 8:42 AM David Edmundson wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 5:45 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > me of them, I've got ideas, others less so. > > > > The first thing that came up was that KiCad seems to need help and has > > had a bad experience

First round of feedback from Fedora 40 KDE Plasma 6 (Wayland-only) discussion

2023-09-18 Thread Neal Gompa
Hey all, So unless you've been living under a rock for the past week, you might have noticed a bunch of buzz about Fedora KDE proposing to drop the X11 session with Plasma 6[1]. Those of you who were at Akademy last year[2] or this year[3] knew that this was coming. For the rest of you... 🤭 Over

Re: C++/library requirements for Plasma 5.26

2022-07-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 8:09 AM Nicolas Fella wrote: > > Hi, > > for Plasma 5.26 I would like to make use of some C++20 features, in > particular coroutines. > > In terms of compiler requirements this should translate to requiring GCC > 10 or Clang 11. > > In addition we would like to require the q

Request for help for developing new XDG StatusNotifier/AppIndicator spec for KDE+GNOME

2022-01-17 Thread Neal Gompa
Hello all, As many of you know, I am one of the leads for the Fedora KDE Special Interest Group (SIG), which develops the Fedora KDE spin[1] and the new Fedora Kinoite[2]. What you may not know is that I'm also a member of the Fedora Workstation Working Group (WG), which develops the Fedora Workst

Re: Using C++20 in Plasma

2021-08-07 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 7:06 AM Nicolas Fella wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to explore whether it would be feasible from a distribution > POV to use C++20 in Plasma (and other non-Frameworks projects). > > In practical terms this would mean something like requiring gcc 10 or > clang 10 (the exact

Re: Can we consider bumping up the Plasma 5.23 release by one week?

2021-06-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:38 AM David Edmundson wrote: > > We discussed this some more, and we are not in favour of moving > forwards for Fedora: > > Reasons given were: > - It either cuts into our beta period, or causes us issues with > framework releases. > - Fedora has regular releases anyway

Re: About some old and hard to maintain effects

2021-06-01 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:22 AM Vlad Zahorodnii wrote: > > On 5/31/21 4:43 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: > > Do you think these effects could be implemented using other > > non-deprecated abstractions? > > Yes. Those effects need to render every animated window into an > offscreen texture and then do thei

Re: Consistent CMake requirements in Plasma

2021-02-12 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:32 PM Nicolas Fella wrote: > > Hi, > > while I was doing some cmake cleanup in Plasma I noticed that our stated > minimum cmake versions are both somewhat inconsistent and super old. > Most Plasma projects state that either 2.8 (released in 2009) or 3.0 > (released in 2014

Re: Synchronized release schedule for Plasma

2020-11-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:25 AM Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 5:10 PM David Edmundson > wrote: >>> >>> As distribution package maintainers, we would like Plasma developers to >>> slightly alter the release schedule to align releases with a more >>> distribution friendly cycle.

Re: Distro integration for Plasma Browser Integration (was: Re: Plasma Browser Integration is in kdereview

2017-06-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hello David. > > Thanks for your effort on plasma browser integration. > > > What options are possible to distribute extensions via distro packaging? > > I ask cause I think at least for chrome / chromium you need a Google account > to u