On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 10:25 AM Aleix Pol <aleix...@kde.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 5:10 PM David Edmundson <da...@davidedmundson.co.uk> 
> wrote:
>>>
>>> As distribution package maintainers, we would like Plasma developers to 
>>> slightly alter the release schedule to align releases with a more 
>>> distribution friendly cycle. You could consider shortening one release 
>>> cycle (and then keep the 6 month schedule) to align releases.
>>
>>
>> We have in the past shuffled things slightly to line up things up with 
>> distros on request, particularly LTS releases. We can certainly explore that 
>> on a one-off basis.
>>
>> >With this schedule in place, we would also benefit from more beta releases 
>> >over a slightly longer period. They would be packaged into the beta and RC 
>> >releases of those distributions thus enabling more pre-release testing.
>>
>> We did have 6 month release cycles in the past.
>>
>> The rationale for moving at the time was twofold:
>>  - people rushed in changes towards the feature freeze as otherwise it would 
>> be aages till their changes reached users
>>  - the more changes we have in a release, the more testing and inevitable 
>> regression fixes we need to do, spreading that out should result in things 
>> being more stable
>>
>> Initially we did every 3 months (which arguably still aligns) then it slowly 
>> slipped to 4.
>>
>> My personal impression is that releases have gotten better as a result of 
>> those changes, so I'm hesitant about reverting that decision.
>>
>
>
> Makes sense. With Qt being less of a moving target though, it could make 
> sense to reevaluate our cadence though, both because we might start looking 
> into the future and because the system we support should not be changing as 
> much.
>

If we don't want to move to 6 months, pulling back from 4 months to 3
months would make it easier for us to not miss Plasma releases.

That being said, with Qt6 now being a thing, wouldn't that mean Qt is
more of a moving target again?



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!

Reply via email to