Jenkins build became unstable: plasma-workspace_master_qt5 #1063

2014-11-12 Thread KDE CI System
See ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Review Request 120876: Forward-port "Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla" from kde-runtime

2014-11-12 Thread Hrvoje Senjan
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120876/ --- (Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 6:57 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 120876: Forward-port "Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla" from kde-runtime

2014-11-12 Thread Hrvoje Senjan
> On Nov. 11, 2014, 11:43 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote: > > 5.1.1 out. should 5(.1.x) be targeted at all? > > Thomas Lübking wrote: > As this is now a straightforward port of what there is in KDE SC 4 and > DrKonqui is atm. useless and crashreports for KF/5 currently suck in 80% of > all case

[Powerdevil] [Bug 340892] New: System Settings's Power management complains about power management service

2014-11-12 Thread Germano Massullo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340892 Bug ID: 340892 Summary: System Settings's Power management complains about power management service Product: Powerdevil Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS: Li

[Powerdevil] [Bug 340892] System Settings's Power management complains about power management service

2014-11-12 Thread Germano Massullo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340892 --- Comment #1 from Germano Massullo --- Created attachment 89555 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=89555&action=edit power manager options -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. __

[Powerdevil] [Bug 340892] System Settings's Power management complains about power management service

2014-11-12 Thread Germano Massullo
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340892 --- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo --- Created attachment 89556 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=89556&action=edit Background services -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Re: Review Request 121105: Show notification configure button only if application actually has configurable notifications

2014-11-12 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121105/ --- (Updated Nov. 12, 2014, 9:04 a.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Review Request 121105: Show notification configure button only if application actually has configurable notifications

2014-11-12 Thread Bhushan Shah
> On Nov. 12, 2014, 1:35 p.m., Bhushan Shah wrote: > > Ship It! Thank YOU! - Bhushan --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121105/#review70268 -

Re: Review Request 121105: Show notification configure button only if application actually has configurable notifications

2014-11-12 Thread Bhushan Shah
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121105/#review70268 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Bhushan Shah On Nov. 11, 2014, 11:20 p

Re: Review Request 121105: Show notification configure button only if application actually has configurable notifications

2014-11-12 Thread Emmanuel Pescosta
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121105/#review70267 --- Ship it! > he's the container expert I don't think so. Code