Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dissabte, 8 de febrer de 2014, a les 16:32:04, David Faure va escriure: > On Saturday 08 February 2014 14:13:40 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > On Saturday, 8. February 2014. 12.58.53 David Faure wrote: > > > Also, kactivities is the only framework that still uses a branch named > > > "frameworks". > > >

Re: plasma workspace integration for akonadi

2014-02-08 Thread Thomas Pfeiffer
On Saturday 08 February 2014 06:46:35 Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Heena Mahour wrote: > > Re implementation of lion mail is required in any case . > > It is currently using data engine which is not the required tool as it > > should use models throughout and all is bas

Re: The Visual Design Group and Plasma Devs

2014-02-08 Thread Jens Reuterberg
That would be awesome Luca - I just don't want to stress out poor Ben so I think we might as well take it a tad slow. Its saturday after all :) ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 08 February 2014, David Faure wrote: > * plasma-framework depends on kactivities which is also not a proper > framework. Shall we make it one and release it together with the others? > It needs a bit of updating in the cmake stuff (it has too many of the > usually toplevel stuff like

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
> more and more places - and especially all of the frameworks themselves. Ok, I'm game for the branch switch. Is there any documentation on how/what should be done to the cmake parts? p.s. > Since then, kdelibs got splitted, so as I said, KF5 stuff is "master" in The thread in question is from

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 08 February 2014 14:13:40 Ivan Čukić wrote: > On Saturday, 8. February 2014. 12.58.53 David Faure wrote: > > Also, kactivities is the only framework that still uses a branch named > > "frameworks". > > > > Can we switch to master = kf5 and KDE/4.13 for the current master, > > assuming

Re: The Visual Design Group and Plasma Devs

2014-02-08 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data sabato 08 febbraio 2014 14:27:49, Jens Reuterberg ha scritto: > Right! The subforum will go live shortly. Its being set up as we speak. :) I > don't want to stress the poor forum admins right now. Note: if Ben is busy, feel free to poke me (einar77 on IRC, #kde-www channel) so I can spee

Re: The Visual Design Group and Plasma Devs

2014-02-08 Thread Jens Reuterberg
Right! The subforum will go live shortly. Its being set up as we speak. :) I don't want to stress the poor forum admins right now. Just hold on to it and I will holler when its live :) On Saturday 08 February 2014 14.25.47 Mark Gaiser wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jens Reuterberg wr

Re: The Visual Design Group and Plasma Devs

2014-02-08 Thread Mark Gaiser
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Jens Reuterberg wrote: > Hey everyone! > Ok you may have heard about us (or not which is cool too). I just wanted to > make a short introduction here since we will focus on Plasma NEXT for the time > being and it might be beneficial if you all felt you had a solid

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Saturday, 8. February 2014. 12.58.53 David Faure wrote: > Also, kactivities is the only framework that still uses a branch named > "frameworks". > > Can we switch to master = kf5 and KDE/4.13 for the current master, assuming > a 4.13 release of it is planned? [otherwise what do we do with maste

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Ivan Čukić
On Saturday, 8. February 2014. 13.26.41 you wrote: > On Saturday 08 February 2014 12:44:48 David Faure wrote: > > * plasma-framework depends on kactivities which is also not a proper > > framework. Shall we make it one and release it together with the others? > > It needs a bit of updating in the

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 08 February 2014 12:44:48 David Faure wrote: > * plasma-framework depends on kactivities which is also not a proper > framework. Shall we make it one and release it together with the others? > It needs a bit of updating in the cmake stuff (it has too many of the > usually toplevel stu

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread David Faure
Also, kactivities is the only framework that still uses a branch named "frameworks". Can we switch to master = kf5 and KDE/4.13 for the current master, assuming a 4.13 release of it is planned? [otherwise what do we do with master?] The only commit that is in master and not in 4.12 is this one

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 08 February 2014 11:36:26 Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:59:19 David Faure wrote: > > On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:55:25 Marco Martin wrote: > > > On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:31:10 David Faure wrote: > > > > > * it's not under frameworks/ in the projects.kd

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:59:19 David Faure wrote: > On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:55:25 Marco Martin wrote: > > On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:31:10 David Faure wrote: > > > > * it's not under frameworks/ in the projects.kde.org hierarchy. Shall > > > > we > > > > move it? > > > > > > >

The Visual Design Group and Plasma Devs

2014-02-08 Thread Jens Reuterberg
Hey everyone! Ok you may have heard about us (or not which is cool too). I just wanted to make a short introduction here since we will focus on Plasma NEXT for the time being and it might be beneficial if you all felt you had a solid way of contacting us and knew what we are about. The KDE Visu

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread David Faure
On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:55:25 Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:31:10 David Faure wrote: > > > * it's not under frameworks/ in the projects.kde.org hierarchy. Shall we > > > move it? > > > > > > * it declares itself to be version 2.0.0. Can I change that to 4.96.0 > > >

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Saturday 08 February 2014 10:31:10 David Faure wrote: > > > > * it's not under frameworks/ in the projects.kde.org hierarchy. Shall we > > move it? > > > > * it declares itself to be version 2.0.0. Can I change that to 4.96.0 like > > all other frameworks? > > Ping? It's now or never, for alp

Re: kf5 alpha 1 : modules, versions

2014-02-08 Thread David Faure
On Thursday 06 February 2014 23:32:11 David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 05 February 2014 22:42:00 Michael Palimaka wrote: > > On 02/03/2014 08:17 PM, David Faure wrote: > > > Any new module that should be added to this release, compared to TP1? > > > > I see that plasma-framework.yaml says tier 3,