On Saturday 08 February 2014 06:46:35 Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Heena Mahour <heena...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Re implementation of lion mail is required in any case . > > It is currently using data engine which is not the required tool as it > > should use models throughout and all is based on QGraphicsView . > > DataEngines are just fine for Plasma Next, actually even the clock applet > is directly using a DataEngine. There was an architectual change in teh DEs > that makes them use models, but they are still fully supported option. > > > It is architecturally broken and not yet finished as was suggested by > > Sebas . > > So , it would be a nice idea for that I think . > > Remember that GSoC is about 3 months of full-time (payed) work, porting > one-two plasmoids can be a couple weekends project at most...
Though it was already usable in practice, sebas never considered Lionmail as "finished", so finishing it means more than merely porting it. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
