On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:46:24 Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> Sorry, I confused the naming here... And I am aware offen the previous
> discussion (followed it, but was not involved) I just think that it might
> make sense to start a New attempt on this, now that everyone is working
> towards way
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 20:48:23 Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2013-09-24, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > * Qt5 doesn't seem to have the API we need to do our xembed tricks
> > anymore,
> >
> > especially QX11EmbedContainer is gone. If we even get it to work under
> >
> > X11, it seems e
On Tuesday, 2013-09-24, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> * Qt5 doesn't seem to have the API we need to do our xembed tricks anymore,
> especially QX11EmbedContainer is gone. If we even get it to work under
> X11, it seems entirely futile to expect this to be feasible in a Wayland
> world.
I think QWin
On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> as i write this, the idea of a hybrid package becomes more and more
> desirable sounding. with a different main script, it should be possible to
> launch the same UI but without it being an actual plasmoid.
>
> this would also change how plasmo
Sorry, I confused the naming here... And I am aware offen the previous
discussion (followed it, but was not involved) I just think that it might
make sense to start a New attempt on this, now that everyone is working
towards wayland. Talking to Xfce is a good idea too, imho. I can ask around
on thi
On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Marco Martin wrote:
> > Xfce), so it makes much sense to discuss post-x systray now and create a
> > Freedesktop document for it - maybe just use DBusmenu...
>
> dbusmenu has nothing to do with systemtrays.
or more precisely, it's ortogonal, we use it to do the icon
On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> GNOME embeds the tray Icons in it's norification area, supporting xembed
> right now. In future, they want a different notification system, which is
> used exclusively (design docs are available, i will look them up at home)
> However, I assume
GNOME embeds the tray Icons in it's norification area, supporting xembed
right now. In future, they want a different notification system, which is
used exclusively (design docs are available, i will look them up at home)
However, I assume GTK+ will have a systray implementation (at least for
Xfce),
On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Martin Graesslin wrote:
> > if Gtk+ supported status notifiers natively, then i’d say “yes”. it
> > doesn’t, so anyone who uses a Gtk+ application with a system tray icon
> > will suddenly not be able to access it. i’m pretty sure that’s going to
> > cause problems.
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 18:04:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > * Qt5 doesn't seem to have the API we need to do our xembed tricks
> > anymore,
> >
> > especially QX11EmbedContainer is gone.
>
> it’s missing more than gone; i’ve heard several times that someone or
> another was working on it.
w
On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 17:06:14 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Now that I have your attention ;), I'd like to discuss the future of the
> system tray. I'm porting it right now to Qt5/KF5, and running into some
> problems.
>
> Quick background: The systemtray widget in Plasma supports
Hey,
Now that I have your attention ;), I'd like to discuss the future of the
system tray. I'm porting it right now to Qt5/KF5, and running into some
problems.
Quick background: The systemtray widget in Plasma supports three kinds of
"Items", traditional, xembed-based systray icons, dbus statu
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 18:03:57 Paul Rohrbach wrote:
> Thank you for accepting the patch :). But I
> can't commit it, because I don't have commit rights.
As you've probably seen, I've committed the patch for you to the corresponding
branches. Thanks a lot for your contribution
On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:51:57 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 11:34:45, Martin Gräßlin va
>
> escriure:
> > On Thursday 19 September 2013 19:30:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > We're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch o
El Dimarts, 24 de setembre de 2013, a les 11:34:45, Martin Gräßlin va
escriure:
> On Thursday 19 September 2013 19:30:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kde-workspace
> > into
> > master next Monday. That means if you're buildin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112727/#review40664
---
> no idea whether that's acceptable
shouldn't be much of an iss
Thank you, i will post a link to the scenario document as soon as i get
back home after work.
2013/9/23 Aaron J. Seigo
> On Monday, September 23, 2013 14:45:53 Michele Andrea Kipiel wrote:
> > is there a preferred way to share documents in the mailing list? is an
> > ubuntu one link an acceptab
On Thursday 19 September 2013 19:30:52 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're planning to merge the frameworks-scratch branch of kde-workspace into
> master next Monday. That means if you're building your Plasma yourself from
> Git (and you're not yet ready for Plasma2 ;)), you should switch
18 matches
Mail list logo
