Re: [KDE Bugtracking System] REMINDER: current Plasma regressions

Is actually anyone looking at these lists? If no: could we get rid off it? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Re: Having an issue with the minimum size of Plasma.WebView

Hi Guys, thanks for your's replies. Looks like even implementing the sizeHint for Plasma.WebView it does not work. So I fixed it by replacing the Plasma.WebView for the QtWebKit.QGraphicsWebView and now it works as expected. More details can be found here: http://pastebin.com/HhMwsD9R Cheers, Pa

[KDE Bugtracking System] REMINDER: current Plasma regressions

Please find below a list of the current regressions reported for Plasma. This is a weekly reminder. This search was scheduled by myr...@kde.org. Plasma regressions -- Bug 202336: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202336 Priority: NOR Severity: normal Platform: Gentoo

Re: Review Request 108400: Improve highlighted contrast in thumbnail tabbox

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 7:59 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > my 2c only: > > > > if air has an unnotable *highlight* frame this should be fixed in the theme. > > if it is not fixable in the theme because the focus is on a mostly light > > and "airy" appearance i would frankly raise the question of

Re: KActivities::Info::linkedResources

> if is an addition rather than changing something already there i think so, > because in this case if the old method is nooped now, it would avoid > potential new users for it (and potential performance drains) that could > happen during 4.10. "Monday, December 17, 2012: KDE SC 4.10 Hard API Fre

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Sunday, January 13, 2013 15:50:25 Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> I think the problem with our QM process is, that we don't have a tool to >> support it. Our bugtracker is (in it's current state) totally useless. Let >> me just show a few stats

Re: Review Request 108417: screenlocker make [escape] "conditionally" turn off the screen

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 9:52 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, lines 272-275 > > > > > > Just in case: should we check for the existence of the interface? I can > > picture

Re: Review Request 108417: screenlocker make [escape] "conditionally" turn off the screen

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 9:52 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, lines 272-275 > > > > > > Just in case: should we check for the existence of the interface? I can > > picture

Re: Review Request 108417: screenlocker make [escape] "conditionally" turn off the screen

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108417/#review25537 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Dario Freddi On Jan. 14, 2013, 9:12 p.m

Re: Review Request 108417: screenlocker make [escape] "conditionally" turn off the screen

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 9:52 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp, lines 272-275 > > > > > > Just in case: should we check for the existence of the interface? I can > > picture

Re: Review Request 108417: screenlocker make [escape] "conditionally" turn off the screen

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108417/#review25531 --- ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/greeterapp.cpp

Review Request 108417: screenlocker make [escape] "conditionally" turn off the screen

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108417/ --- Review request for Plasma and Dario Freddi. Description --- Requires

Please unbreak kdeplasma-addons

Note: I'm not subscribed to plasma-devel, keep me in CC Hi Weng, it seems you broke the build of kdeplasma-addons with http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/kdeplasma-addons_stable/101/changes Error at http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/kdeplasma-addons_stable/101/console Can you please fi

Re: KActivities::Info::linkedResources

On Monday 14 January 2013, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > could be isResourceLinked() factored in a change so small that can be > > backported? > > The service in 4.10 already has this method (it would need to be > implemented in a better way than it is), but the library doesn't expose > it. Can we change

Re: KActivities::Info::linkedResources

> the method is indeed evil, > not sure about breaking the released api tough That is why I'm asking - we have two evils - bad method vs semantic api change > i think it should stay just a deprecated, or at most be a noop (modulo some > kWarning) I'd like to go for a noop. > now a thing i wond

Re: repositories beyond kde-workspace

On Monday 14 January 2013, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hi.. > > as Alex noted in an email in the "reflecting on 4.10" thread, we have > several current and upcoming git repos that are topically part of the > workspaces. such repositories include: > > * bluedevil > * networkmanagement > * kscreen (it'

Re: Review Request 108375: fix bug 311116 / screenlocker hiding

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108375/#review25517 --- This review has been submitted with commit ed7b99f14f52b9ab43b

Re: Review Request 108377: fix rest von 313020

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108377/#review25518 --- This review has been submitted with commit c74cc6e9df97c0acbcf

Re: Review Request 108318: Port screenlocker greeter app away from Kephal

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108318/#review25516 --- This review has been submitted with commit 58291c169ad6f0c0e65

Re: Review Request 108375: fix bug 311116 / screenlocker hiding

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108375/#review25514 --- This review has been submitted with commit 17053ae6ec7dd9435b9

Re: Review Request 108377: fix rest von 313020

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108377/#review25515 --- This review has been submitted with commit 5997f324c8cef97b7f4

Re: KActivities::Info::linkedResources

On Monday 14 January 2013, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi all, > > KActivities::Info::linkedResources() is an evil method that needs to go > away - it retrieves a list of linked resources synchronously. Currently, > it is used only in Share-Like-Connect, in a funny way - to check whether a > specific reso

Re: Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:11 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Monday 14 January 2013 16:24:28 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> > Whoever is maintainer of a component, should become the >> > default assignee for bugs in that component. No longer a one address for >> > all assignee. >> >> i think the maintain

KActivities::Info::linkedResources

Hi all, KActivities::Info::linkedResources() is an evil method that needs to go away - it retrieves a list of linked resources synchronously. Currently, it is used only in Share-Like-Connect, in a funny way - to check whether a specific resource is linked to the activity like this: linkedRe

Re: Review Request 108414: watch for screen addition/removal and resize

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 6:34 p.m., Xuetian Weng wrote: > > I guess you want to check https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108375/ , that > > patch seems already cover this. indeed, that patch covers it. i would prefer that one to this. - Marco --

Re: Review Request 108414: watch for screen addition/removal and resize

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108414/#review25510 --- I guess you want to check https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On 14/01/13 15:24, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: * it means adopting bugzilla as our One True Workflow tool. that doesn't just sound beaurocratic, it is beaurocratic. if someone appears with a patch fixing some bug or implementing some feature that isn't in bugzilla, do we first send them to create one b

Review Request 108414: watch for screen addition/removal and resize

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108414/ --- Review request for Plasma. Description --- it's quite rare that a scr

repositories beyond kde-workspace

hi.. as Alex noted in an email in the "reflecting on 4.10" thread, we have several current and upcoming git repos that are topically part of the workspaces. such repositories include: * bluedevil * networkmanagement * kscreen (it's dependency, libkscreen, is probably a Frameworks topic, not wo

Re: Having an issue with the minimum size of Plasma.WebView

In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 17:39:12, Aaron J. Seigo ha scritto: (apologies if this comes doubled, wrong address in the "From" field) [Plasma Python bindings] > do we need python bindings? The bindings are there because libplasma is in kdelibs, and as such they are provided by PyKDE4 (which c

Re: Having an issue with the minimum size of Plasma.WebView

On Monday, January 14, 2013 16:33:48 Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 16:30:15, Aaron J. Seigo ha scritto: > > the real fix, however, is not to do the UI in python. use QML. > > Speaking of that, how does Plasma (or the workspace in general) fit when > using QML, according to

Re: reflecting on 4.10

ok, so finally my answers ... i deliberately waited until the discussion was done give my own answers as it's really hard to facilitate a discussion and participate at the same time. (well, i did poke my thoughts into the thread a few times .. :) On Thursday, January 10, 2013 22:05:28 Aaron J.

Re: Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Monday 14 January 2013 16:24:28 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > *Every commit should be referenced to a bug* > > What is the motivation for a commit? It's either a bug fix or it is a new > > feature/improvement. If it's a bug it's clear that there has to be a bug > > report for it (out of experience:

Re: Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Monday 14 January 2013 16:24:28 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > Whoever is maintainer of a component, should become the > > default assignee for bugs in that component. No longer a one address for > > all assignee. > > i think the maintainer should be added as a default CC, but if each > component go

Re: Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Monday 14 January 2013 16:21:04 Alex Fiestas wrote: > On Sunday 13 January 2013 15:50:25 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > *Every commit should be referenced to a bug* > > What is the motivation for a commit? It's either a bug fix or it is a new > > feature/improvement. If it's a bug it's clear that the

4.10 reflection summary

hi... i hope i capture all the feedback below, if i missed something, please say so in a reply to this email :) Question: how do you think 4.10 went? Answers: Consensus seems to be that some good things were done, but few, if any of us, were truly satisfied with the 4.10 cycle. Commentary: Th

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On 14/01/13 15:21, Alex Fiestas wrote: On Sunday 13 January 2013 15:50:25 Martin Gräßlin wrote: *Every commit should be referenced to a bug* What is the motivation for a commit? It's either a bug fix or it is a new feature/improvement. If it's a bug it's clear that there has to be a bug report f

Re: Having an issue with the minimum size of Plasma.WebView

In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2013 16:30:15, Aaron J. Seigo ha scritto: > the real fix, however, is not to do the UI in python. use QML. Speaking of that, how does Plasma (or the workspace in general) fit when using QML, according to these 3 definitions (taken from the PyQt docs): 1. Pure applicatio

Re: Having an issue with the minimum size of Plasma.WebView

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 21:16:16 Paulo Nogueira wrote: > I'm writing a very basic plasma widget using PyQt and QWebKit, where > I'm trying to set a custom size for my widget bellow of 128px. could be due to this in the implementation of Plasma::WebView: QSizeF WebView::sizeHint(Qt::SizeHint w

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Sunday, January 13, 2013 15:50:25 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > I think the problem with our QM process is, that we don't have a tool to > support it. Our bugtracker is (in it's current state) totally useless. Let > me just show a few stats for Plasma: the difference betwen Plasma and KWin components

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Sunday 13 January 2013 15:50:25 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > *Every commit should be referenced to a bug* > What is the motivation for a commit? It's either a bug fix or it is a new > feature/improvement. If it's a bug it's clear that there has to be a bug > report for it (out of experience: there is

Re: Review Request 108400: Improve highlighted contrast in thumbnail tabbox

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 8:59 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > my 2c only: > > > > if air has an unnotable *highlight* frame this should be fixed in the theme. > > if it is not fixable in the theme because the focus is on a mostly light > > and "airy" appearance i would frankly raise the question of

Re: Review Request 108400: Improve highlighted contrast in thumbnail tabbox

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 7:59 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > my 2c only: > > > > if air has an unnotable *highlight* frame this should be fixed in the theme. > > if it is not fixable in the theme because the focus is on a mostly light > > and "airy" appearance i would frankly raise the question of

Re: krunner qml

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Friday, January 11, 2013 13:16:03 Aleix Pol wrote: > > Why do we need a place to put it? > > because people were generally unaware the System Activity window even > existed > because there was no visible ui to show it. > > this was one o

Re: Review Request 108400: Improve highlighted contrast in thumbnail tabbox

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 8:59 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > my 2c only: > > > > if air has an unnotable *highlight* frame this should be fixed in the theme. > > if it is not fixable in the theme because the focus is on a mostly light > > and "airy" appearance i would frankly raise the question of

Re: Review Request 108400: Improve highlighted contrast in thumbnail tabbox

> On Jan. 14, 2013, 7:59 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > my 2c only: > > > > if air has an unnotable *highlight* frame this should be fixed in the theme. > > if it is not fixable in the theme because the focus is on a mostly light > > and "airy" appearance i would frankly raise the question of

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

Not going to quote... Long emails are long :p I pretty much agree and will feel comfortable working with this process, besides the "bug for feature" part, we have been doing the same in solid, for example in kscreen right now we have: 6 bugs as NeedInfo, waiting 3 wishes in Unconfirmed Similar

Re: Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On Monday 14 January 2013 11:42:10 Alex Merry wrote: > On 14/01/13 10:22, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > I think this would also be interesting for Plasma: > > * which Plasmoids are running > > * which containments are present > > * what are the settings of each Plasmoid > > Note that there are potentia

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

On 14/01/13 10:22, Martin Gräßlin wrote: I think this would also be interesting for Plasma: * which Plasmoids are running * which containments are present * what are the settings of each Plasmoid Note that there are potential privacy issues here. Unlike KWin, there is a fair chance that plasmo

Re: XDpms in screenlocker

Hi everyone, 2013/1/14 Oliver Henshaw > On 13 January 2013 22:57, Thomas Lübking > wrote: > > ** please keep me in cc as well as likely dario ** > > > > I looked into the powerdevil sources, reactivated the turnOffScreen dbus > > method, implemented it and that works - more or less (screeen tur

Re: Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

On Monday 14 January 2013 11:16:43 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Saturday 12 January 2013 17:56:14 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > > [*] Historical note no one will probably care about > > > > > > actually, i care :) i rather suspected this was the case, given the > > > number > > > of developers i've hear

Re: Thoughts about a better Quality Management process for Plasma

of course I have forgotten to mention one suggestion. In KWin we added a totally awesome feature to get introspection on the running instance. If you have not seen it yet, just try: qdbus org.kde.kwin /KWin supportInformation This significantly improved the time we spent on bug reports. Instead

Re: Re: reflecting on 4.10

On Saturday 12 January 2013 17:56:14 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > [*] Historical note no one will probably care about > > > > actually, i care :) i rather suspected this was the case, given the number > > of developers i've heard this same kind of story from. the reason for > > moving to packages var

Re: Review Request 108400: Improve highlighted contrast in thumbnail tabbox

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108400/ --- (Updated Jan. 14, 2013, 9:08 a.m.) Review request for kwin and Plasma. C