---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105032/#review14440
---
Looks good to me.
Will let someone from Plasma (sebas probably)
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>> > Starting from the very beginning, I honestly can't understand the
>> > arguments about "we already have a vision". Assume this is true - this
>> > vision was created (and eventually evolved)
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ural Mullabaev <
> ural.mullab...@rosalab.ru > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Yes, StackFolder is an independent applet and placed in a playground
> repo
> ( https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/base/stackfolder ). It
> was announced by Denis Koryavov in the kde-d
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Ural Mullabaev wrote:
>
> Yes, StackFolder is an independent applet and placed in a playground repo
> (https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/base/stackfolder). It was
> announced by Denis Koryavov in the kde-devel mailing list with another our
> utilities. I
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> >
> > It would be good if you posted your patches / code to
> > http://reviewboard.kde.org, so we can have a look and judge about
> > its
> > inclusion and into which release.
> >
> > In general, we're very welcoming to new and cool Plasma addons
After treading the whole thread, it seems that there are people concern that
the survey can do more bad than good, at least when it comes to the whole
workspace.
Maybe we can do a hang out (G+ thing) to sort thigns out? emails are shitty
medium to talk these things and come to an agreetment.
D
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>
> It would be good if you posted your patches / code to
> http://reviewboard.kde.org, so we can have a look and judge about its
> inclusion and into which release.
>
> In general, we're very welcoming to new and cool Plasma addons, we just
> need
Hi Ural,
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 17:19:46 Ural Mullabaev wrote:
> I am a Rosa Linux developer. Recently we implemented Drag-and-Drop mechanism
> for StackFolder and would like to know chances to include StackFolder in
> KDE 4.9.
For new features, it is unfortunately too late. We're already past
On Tuesday 05 June 2012 14:21:23 Marco Martin wrote:
> What could be a nice idea in the sprint, is a short session with a debate
> (maybe even moderated by someone, almost in talk-show style :p) on this very
> same topic: why stopping to consider the desktop a "special thing" is
> right? why is wro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105139/
---
(Updated June 5, 2012, 1:42 p.m.)
Review request for kwin, Plasma and Mart
Hi all,
I am a Rosa Linux developer. Recently we implemented Drag-and-Drop mechanism
for StackFolder and would like to know chances to include StackFolder in KDE
4.9.
Regards,
Ural Mullabaev
Rosa Laboratory
www.rosalab.com
___
Plasma-devel mailing lis
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 14:57:42 Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 21:37:42 Mark wrote:
> > > Seriously, thank you for the information. That little piece of vital
> > > information was missing on the wiki. I added it:
> > > http://
2012/6/5 Aaron J. Seigo :
> On Monday, June 4, 2012 23:32:08 Alex Fiestas wrote:
>> On Monday, June 04, 2012 11:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
>> > That might come as a surprise, but
>> >
>> > Plasma == Active
>> >
>> > Making a difference between those (and th
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 21:37:42 Mark wrote:
> > Seriously, thank you for the information. That little piece of vital
> > information was missing on the wiki. I added it:
> > http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Plasma/QML/API#Di
On Tuesday, June 5, 2012 11:23:15 Björn Balazs wrote:
> We - as the designers and creators of KDE - will have to understand and
> believe what people say. And we will use only what makes sense to us to
> create a vision, personas, etc - and at the end software.
you can't make sense of something f
On Monday, June 4, 2012 23:32:08 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Monday, June 04, 2012 11:00:56 PM Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > That might come as a surprise, but
> >
> > Plasma == Active
> >
> > Making a difference between those (and the KDE workspace) only makes sense
On Monday, June 4, 2012 22:49:35 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> Tokamak 5 is (wrongly?) understood as the Plasma team sprint, this sprint is
> not only about plasma but instead about "How we move the workspace
> forward". It is actually closer to the Active sprint.
Tokamak, or any sprint, is what we make i
On Monday, June 4, 2012 23:57:22 Björn Balazs wrote:
> What I try to do with this survey, is to ask users / the community to report
> about their life - or to stay in the picture: let them imagine where the
> bridge could be built and how the existence of the bridge would change
> their life.
and
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > Starting from the very beginning, I honestly can't understand the
> > arguments about "we already have a vision". Assume this is true - this
> > vision was created (and eventually evolved) over the last, I think
> > now, 3 years. Maybe a bit more
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 21:37:42 Mark wrote:
> Seriously, thank you for the information. That little piece of vital
> information was missing on the wiki. I added it:
> http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Plasma/QML/API#Dialog though
> you probably want to make it more acurate.
Stating
Hey,
On Tuesday, June 05, 2012 13:31:44 Dario Freddi wrote:
> This mail was originally born as a reply to the survey thread, but it
> eventually drifted into something bigger which probably deserved his
> own thread.
>
> First of all I'd like to speak both with a Plasma hat (which I think I
> alw
2012/6/5 Marco Martin :
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
>
>> Nobody ever suggested to do a user-led approach, to stick in the
>> terminology of the article. Even though I have a somewhat more
>> differentiated view on the topic than it is been layed out in the article,
>> the main po
This mail was originally born as a reply to the survey thread, but it
eventually drifted into something bigger which probably deserved his
own thread.
First of all I'd like to speak both with a Plasma hat (which I think I
always wore, at least somehow) and with an external hat, as it'll be
probabl
> another thing that i wish it was possible that is a bit troublesome at the
> moment is a thing like this part of the mockup that i have not (yet) posted:
> http://wstaw.org/m/2012/06/05/plasma-desktoprK3844.png
This is not that different to the 3D dock. It just needs some
contextual information
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Thijs Heus wrote:
> > the unfortunate part of this problem is that there is no -legal- way
> > around (while there would be plenty of -technical- ways around ;)
>
> With 'dealt with' I did not per se mean 'resolve' ;)... The funny thing is
> though that the weather forcast
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Thijs Heus wrote:
>
> > > I've just created a '4.9 regressions' search list that are contain all
> > > the
> >
> > bugs that are valid against 4.9, but not against 4.8. Some of them, most
> > notably the weather plasm
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
> Nobody ever suggested to do a user-led approach, to stick in the
> terminology of the article. Even though I have a somewhat more
> differentiated view on the topic than it is been layed out in the article,
> the main points are correct (ok, the artic
On Monday 04 June 2012, Ivan Čukić wrote:
>
> :D )
> :
> >> - visually connecting the popups with the applets
> >>example: http://kde-look.org/CONTENT/content-pre1/53086-1.png
> >>or a 'triangle' pointing to the applet or anything else that people
> >> can devise
> >>(yeah, this is my
Marco, all,
Am Dienstag, 5. Juni 2012, 10:01:44 schrieb Marco Martin:
> On Monday 04 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
> > Aaron, all,
> >
> > thanks for your mail. It is good to adress these kinds of worries directly
> > - and before the survey gets started. I actually get confronted with them
> >
On Tuesday 05 June 2012, Thijs Heus wrote:
> > I've just created a '4.9 regressions' search list that are contain all
> > the
>
> bugs that are valid against 4.9, but not against 4.8. Some of them, most
> notably the weather plasmoid and the battery plasmoid, are already getting
> some duplicates
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Monday, June 4, 2012 14:51:14 Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> > Heya Plasma developers,
> >
> > This mail just to give you a little heads up on what has been done:
> >
> > As you can see for yourself in the bugzilla statistics [1], you now
On Monday 04 June 2012, Björn Balazs wrote:
> Aaron, all,
>
> thanks for your mail. It is good to adress these kinds of worries directly
> - and before the survey gets started. I actually get confronted with them
> often in my work.
>
> I personally think we do not need to worry. In most projects
32 matches
Mail list logo
