Re: Review Request: Preconfigurable plasmoids

> On April 28, 2011, 9:19 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > an interesting idea, but the configuration values should not appear in the > > metadata.desktop file. it not only bloats up the # of keys we have, it > > doesn't scale to plasmoids with more/different configuration. > > > > i think this

Re: Review Request: Preconfigurable plasmoids

> On April 28, 2011, 9:19 p.m., Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > an interesting idea, but the configuration values should not appear in the > > metadata.desktop file. it not only bloats up the # of keys we have, it > > doesn't scale to plasmoids with more/different configuration. > > > > i think this

Re: Idea for Season of KDE

On Wednesday 04 May 2011 20:03:27 John Layt wrote: > On Wednesday 04 May 2011 12:35:27 Samikshan Bairagya wrote: > > Hi, I am interested in participating in the season of KDE with a project > > idea which is related to the Digital-Clock Plasma Applet. > > While the Digital-Clock applet does show ev

Re: Idea for Season of KDE

On Wednesday 04 May 2011 12:35:27 Samikshan Bairagya wrote: > Hi, I am interested in participating in the season of KDE with a project > idea which is related to the Digital-Clock Plasma Applet. > While the Digital-Clock applet does show events (mainly holidays) it can be > put to better use if we

Re: Re: questions about KWin shadows

On Wednesday 04 May 2011 19:58:14 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 17:19:37 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > that is in fact the main idea of the new shadow system as the compositor > > cannot know about the light model used by the client, whether to apply drop > > shadows etc. etc. And o

Re: questions about KWin shadows

On Wednesday 04 May 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 17:19:37 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > that is in fact the main idea of the new shadow system as the compositor > > cannot know about the light model used by the client, whether to apply > > drop shadows etc. etc. And of course

Re: questions about KWin shadows

On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 17:19:37 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > that is in fact the main idea of the new shadow system as the compositor > cannot know about the light model used by the client, whether to apply drop > shadows etc. etc. And of course the compositor doesn't know the clients > shape like Ma

Re: Re: questions about KWin shadows

On Wednesday 04 May 2011 13:32:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:19:34 Marco Martin wrote: > > On Monday 02 May 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > Windows wich have decorations are the only ones which should not get the > > > shadows. Docks should work. > > > > > > In any case

Re: Review Request: Check for new comic strips

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101252/#review3104 --- This review has been submitted with commit f80d5c09f4c9e414b39a

Idea for Season of KDE

Hi, I am interested in participating in the season of KDE with a project idea which is related to the Digital-Clock Plasma Applet. While the Digital-Clock applet does show events (mainly holidays) it can be put to better use if we add more features to it. This is the idea: On clicking on any date f

Re: questions about KWin shadows

On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 10:19:34 Marco Martin wrote: > On Monday 02 May 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Windows wich have decorations are the only ones which should not get the > > shadows. Docks should work. > > > > In any case I recommend reading [1]. Feel free to show me the diff. > > > > Chee

Re: Review Request: Implements Plasma::TabBar::setTabHighlighted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101264/#review3103 --- This review has been submitted with commit 0d9efa0f939ece18849e

Re: SoK idea: Improve krunner result displaying and navigation.

Hi again. So, based on this list, I made a 12 week plan for the project based on the 12 week scheme used in GSoC: Week 1/2: Tweak Nepomuk runner Week 2/3: Tweak File search runner Week 3: Tweak Google runner Weeks 4 to 5 (or 6?): Put result querying in a different thread Week 6: Polish what has b

Re: Review Request: Implements Plasma::TabBar::setTabHighlighted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101264/#review3102 --- Ship it! looks fine; a few minor tweaks but nothing that stands

Re: Plasma::Svg::paint

On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 00:06:26 Alex Merry wrote: > My question is: what is intended to happen here? bubblemon was assuming if the Svg containsMultipleImages, then the element should be scaled to the Svg's size. if the Svg does not containMultipleImages, then the elements should be scaled re

Re: questions about KWin shadows

On Wednesday 04 May 2011, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > thanks for the answers .. > > On Monday, May 2, 2011 17:34:17 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > * is there a way to get the default sizes for the offsets? e.g. if > > > passing in -1 or some such? > > > > there is no default offset size. It is completly

Re: Review Request: Fix build of libkdeclarative with ENABLE_FINAL.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101278/#review3101 --- Ship it! looks fine, though i'd prefer not using underscores (s

Re: questions about KWin shadows

thanks for the answers .. On Monday, May 2, 2011 17:34:17 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > * is there a way to get the default sizes for the offsets? e.g. if > > passing in -1 or some such? > > there is no default offset size. It is completly controlled by the client why should the client be forced to c

Re: Review Request: Activity ResourceInstance class for API review

> On May 2, 2011, 3:14 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote: > > experimental/libkactivities/resourceinstance.h, line 52 > > > > > > The thing I don't like about the /empty/ constructor is that the user > > could thing the class

Re: QtQuick 2.0?

there won't be binary compatibility with c++ items that subclass qdeclarativeitem or qgraphicswidget due the difference on how the paint operation happens. however they will be pretty easy to reimplement maintaining qml source compatibility. in Plasma we plan to ship both, once qml2 is out (to

Re: QtQuick 2.0?

FYI QtQuick 2 will not be compatible with QtQuick 1.x. Something to keep in mind, that there may be a migration step. context: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.qml/2499 Alan Alpert wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2011 03:39:22 ext Jason H wrote: >> I thought with modularization, that what is

Re: QtQuick 2.0?

FYI QtQuick 2 will not be compatible with QtQuick 1.x. Something to keep in mind, that there may be a migration step. context: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.qml/2499 Alan Alpert wrote: > On Wed, 4 May 2011 03:39:22 ext Jason H wrote: >> I thought with modularization, that what is

Re: Got into GSoC!

On Tuesday 26 April 2011, Viranch Mehta wrote: > Hi, > > As all of you might have known by now, my proposal (QML port of Plasmoids) > just got accepted into GSoC. I want to thank all the community members of > Plasma and KDE for giving me the opportunity :) Hope to make the plasma and > KDE a bett

Re: questions about KWin shadows

On Monday 02 May 2011, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Windows wich have decorations are the only ones which should not get the > shadows. Docks should work. > > In any case I recommend reading [1]. Feel free to show me the diff. > > Cheers > Martin > > [1]: https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdebase

Re: Plasma::Svg::paint

On Wednesday 04 May 2011, Alex Merry wrote: > I have a question about the way Plasma::Svg::paint is supposed to work > when an elementId is given, but a size is not. > did you do setContanisMultipleElements(true)? -- Marco Martin ___ Plasma-devel mai