Re: Review Request: Launcher support for libtaskmanager

2010-08-25 Thread Aaron Seigo
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/4585/#review7215 --- Ship it! looks good :) let's get this into svn and then see about add

Re: Review Request: Launcher support for libtaskmanager

2010-08-25 Thread Anton Kreuzkamp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/4585/ --- (Updated 2010-08-25 18:12:01.192415) Review request for Plasma. Changes --

Re: Review Request: Launcher support for libtaskmanager

2010-08-25 Thread Anton Kreuzkamp
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/4585/ --- (Updated 2010-08-25 17:59:38.336993) Review request for Plasma. Changes --

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, August 25, 2010, Emdek wrote: > On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek wrote: > >> What specifically doesn't work properly? > > > > if i use the pre-built mode with the reflections in a panel of ~27px > > high, it > > doesn't fit. > >

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Wednesday, August 25, 2010, Emdek wrote: > > /me thinkssome policies about that should be written down somewhere... > > Yeah, good idea, but where? community.kde.org/Plasma is a good place to start them. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Emdek
On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> What specifically doesn't work properly? > if i use the pre-built mode with the reflections in a panel of ~27px > high, it > doesn't fit. This version should fix it: http://wklej.org/id/380889/ If th

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Emdek
On 25-08-2010 at 13:47:11 Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 25 August 2010, Emdek wrote: >> On 25-08-2010 at 13:30:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> > On Wednesday 25 August 2010 13:16:17 Emdek wrote: >> >> On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> >> > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek w

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 25 August 2010, Emdek wrote: > On 25-08-2010 at 13:30:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 August 2010 13:16:17 Emdek wrote: > >> On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > >> > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek wrote: > >> >> What specifically doesn't work properly

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Emdek
On 25-08-2010 at 13:30:49 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday 25 August 2010 13:16:17 Emdek wrote: >> On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: >> > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> >> What specifically doesn't work properly? >> > >> > if i use the pre-built mode with the ref

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday 25 August 2010 13:16:17 Emdek wrote: > On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek wrote: > >> What specifically doesn't work properly? > > > > if i use the pre-built mode with the reflections in a panel of ~27px > > high, it > > doesn't f

Re: kdereview: adjustable clock

2010-08-25 Thread Emdek
On 24-08-2010 at 23:02:15 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday, August 24, 2010, Emdek wrote: >> What specifically doesn't work properly? > if i use the pre-built mode with the reflections in a panel of ~27px > high, it > doesn't fit. Well, that format was added mostly to use on desktop (reflecti