---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/452/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
Calling KHistoryComboBox::addToHistor
On March 26, 2009 21:17:08 Chani wrote:
> http://chani.ccdevnet.org/soc-application-2009.txt
>
btw, I've submitted this to the gsoc site now. :)
--
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
www.chani3.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/#review654
---
great! a few small issues to take care of; the next step is now to read
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/417/#review653
---
Small comment, otherwise looks OK. You can send the notes.svgz file to m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/
---
(Updated 2009-03-27 12:37:45.873892)
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/
---
(Updated 2009-03-27 12:28:22.628368)
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Artur Souza(MoRpHeUz) <
morph...@openbossa.org> wrote:
> Hey!
>
> First of all: welcome to plasma and kde! =)
Thank You :)
>
>
> On Friday 27 March 2009 15:25:15 sujith h wrote:
> > > can you publish the patch to reviewboard.kde.org?
> > > makes very easy for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
As per Aron Seigo's suggestion in the
Hey!
First of all: welcome to plasma and kde! =)
On Friday 27 March 2009 15:25:15 sujith h wrote:
> > can you publish the patch to reviewboard.kde.org?
> > makes very easy for everyone reviewing and commenting the patch
Just go to http://reviewboard.kde.org and register yourself. This is a web
Hi,
> always good seeing somebody hacking on plasma, welcome :)
>
> can you publish the patch to reviewboard.kde.org?
> makes very easy for everyone reviewing and commenting the patch
>
I can do that. But am a newbie to KDE. Hence Aron suggested me to do a first
task. If someone clicks on launcher,
On Friday 27 March 2009 18:31:58 sylvain jolivet wrote:
> The reason is that the user can and has the right to know when he changed
> his note.
Why?
> I'm sorry but I have no example in mind, but there must be.
--
sebas
http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
_
On Friday 27 March 2009, sujith h wrote:
> Hi Aron,
>
> As per discussion in #plasma, I had modified the
> kdebase/workspace/plasma/applets/kickoff/applet/applet.cpp.
> I had compiled it under my build directory. Now can you guide me what next
> to be done to acheive the goal. I am attaching the
>
Hi Aron,
As per discussion in #plasma, I had modified the
kdebase/workspace/plasma/applets/kickoff/applet/applet.cpp.
I had compiled it under my build directory. Now can you guide me what next
to be done to acheive the goal. I am attaching the
patch with this mail.
Sujith H
--
സുജിത് ഹരിദാസന്
B
The reason is that the user can and has the right to know when he changed his
note.
I'm sorry but I have no example in mind, but there must be.
> From: se...@kde.org
> To: syjitpt...@hotmail.com
> Subject: Re: Review Request: The option Date for plasmoid Notes.
> Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:01:4
On Friday 27 March 2009 17:22:21 sylvain jolivet wrote:
> it is my point of view. so...
It has nothing to do with a point of view. UI options and additions like this
come at a cost, namely visual clutter. There has to be a good reason to add
it. This reason is why I'm after.
Generally that reas
Davide Bettio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you revert this patch?
> I think that your patch doesn't fulfill user and plasma requirements.
> IMHO it is too slow and weird. I think that users may get annoyed by that
> animation after a couple of times.
> I remember that Zack Rusin has wrote an interesting p
Oops! wrong term :P
Well what I actually wanted to say is that the user would type in some code
and click on Preview so that he could get a preview. So, is it fit to be
sent as a GSoC proposal ?
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Artur Souza(MoRpHeUz) <
morph...@openbossa.org> wrote:
> On Friday 27
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/417/
---
(Updated 2009-03-27 09:29:49.619133)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
On Friday 27 March 2009 16:13:33 Sylvain Jolivet wrote:
> > On 2009-03-27 07:40:24, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > > I'm not sure what the usecase here is exactly. Can you expand on this a
> > > bit?
> > >
> > > Also, UI wise it looks to rough for my taste. Isn't there a nicer way
> > > to show the la
A Friday 27 March 2009 14:53:07, Rob Scheepmaker escreveu:
> Hello Lauri,
>
> Some suggestions for improving your proposal:
>
> Currently your application is a bit vague. You're not telling much more
> about what you're trying to accomplish then what's on the GSoC ideas page.
> I'd suggest you incl
On Wednesday 25 March 2009 09:36:50 Fabrizio Montesi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Keep in mind that right now I'm concentrating on the "using services"
> > part of
> > the library. I'm somehow "forced" to put the "exposing services" part on
> > hold
> > because
> On 2009-03-27 07:40:24, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the usecase here is exactly. Can you expand on this a bit?
> >
> > Also, UI wise it looks to rough for my taste. Isn't there a nicer way to
> > show the last modified bit? Maybe along with more meta information,
> > prefer
> On 2009-03-27 07:40:24, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the usecase here is exactly. Can you expand on this a bit?
> >
> > Also, UI wise it looks to rough for my taste. Isn't there a nicer way to
> > show the last modified bit? Maybe along with more meta information,
> > prefer
Hi Michael,
On Friday 27 March 2009 11:35:13 Michael Rudolph wrote:
> I'll create a page on techbase and after a little discussion here, we
> can add use cases one by one. What do you think? What would you want
> to do with your MID?
Yes, I like the "use case oriented research". We do a lot of th
Hello Lauri,
Some suggestions for improving your proposal:
Currently your application is a bit vague. You're not telling much more about
what you're trying to accomplish then what's on the GSoC ideas page. I'd
suggest you include some more specifics, maybe some simple mockups since it is
a rat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/415/#review642
---
I'm not sure what the usecase here is exactly. Can you expand on this a
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 18:42, Marco Martin wrote:
>
> other things are really chained by their nature to be an "application"
> presented as is, like games or things like a media player or a web browser,
> that are pretty central on a mid are really tied to the concept of application
Hi Marco,
r
On Thursday 26 March 2009 21:53:32 Davide Bettio wrote:
> Can you revert this patch?
> I think that your patch doesn't fulfill user and plasma requirements.
> IMHO it is too slow and weird. I think that users may get annoyed by that
> animation after a couple of times.
> I remember that Zack Rusin
On Friday 27 March 2009 02:09:24 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
> preview when he makes changes and compiles the plasmoid again. So, there's
> no need to constantly keep displaying the preview.
Just remember that main Plasmate's focus is scripted plasmoids, so no need to
compile code here ;)
> Inst
29 matches
Mail list logo
