Peter Fern wrote:
> What version are you running? The problem that sparked this thread is
> that <2.9.21 bind backend doesn't handle NAPTR, and =2.9.21 includes the
> MOADNSParser, which doesn't handle backslashes correctly for at least
> gmysql (I assume for every backend).
We've used from 2.9.
Duane wrote:
I've never had a problem with \+ in PDNS...
What version are you running? The problem that sparked this thread is
that <2.9.21 bind backend doesn't handle NAPTR, and =2.9.21 includes the
MOADNSParser, which doesn't handle backslashes correctly for at least
gmysql (I assume f
Peter Fern wrote:
> Correct, however we often have a requirement to match a substring and
> sub it into another pattern to translate one number range to another,
> hence the requirement for regex. And regardless - it's currently
> impossible to escape characters like '+' since the backslashes are
Duane wrote:
Peter Fern wrote:
All I'm trying to do is get PDNS to return a record verbatim from the
backend (actually, I've just reviewed the RFC, which says a
double-backslash in the zone must return a single in the response).
Simply matching '\\' and returning '\' is a low-cost operation
Peter Fern wrote:
> All I'm trying to do is get PDNS to return a record verbatim from the
> backend (actually, I've just reviewed the RFC, which says a
> double-backslash in the zone must return a single in the response).
> Simply matching '\\' and returning '\' is a low-cost operation, and
> req
Duane wrote:
Peter Fern wrote:
Duane wrote:
It's pointless trying to expand regular expressions from within the DNS
server, either it will increase load unnecessarily or the regular
expressions were designed to be expanded by a client requesting the
information.
I'm aware tha
Peter Fern wrote:
> Duane wrote:
>> It's pointless trying to expand regular expressions from within the DNS
>> server, either it will increase load unnecessarily or the regular
>> expressions were designed to be expanded by a client requesting the
>> information.
>>
>
> I'm aware that parsing o
Duane wrote:
It's pointless trying to expand regular expressions from within the DNS
server, either it will increase load unnecessarily or the regular
expressions were designed to be expanded by a client requesting the
information.
I'm aware that parsing of the regex is meant to be done clie
Peter Fern wrote:
> Duane wrote:
>> Peter Fern wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone point me to roughly where I should be looking in the codebase
>>> to patch this out? I imagine somewhere in this new universal parser? I
>>> assume it will only be a couple of lines to fix, but I don't have the
>>> spare he
Duane wrote:
Peter Fern wrote:
Can anyone point me to roughly where I should be looking in the codebase
to patch this out? I imagine somewhere in this new universal parser? I
assume it will only be a couple of lines to fix, but I don't have the
spare headspace right now to come to grips wit
Peter Fern wrote:
> Can anyone point me to roughly where I should be looking in the codebase
> to patch this out? I imagine somewhere in this new universal parser? I
> assume it will only be a couple of lines to fix, but I don't have the
> spare headspace right now to come to grips with another c
A big congrats on the performance of the pdns-recursor.
We recently switched from bind8 to bind9 (because of the recent dns
vulnerabilities) then to pdns-recursor (because of performance and
stability issues).
After the upgrade to pdns-recursor cpu utilisation dropped to 10% from
50% with bi
Can anyone point me to roughly where I should be looking in the codebase
to patch this out? I imagine somewhere in this new universal parser? I
assume it will only be a couple of lines to fix, but I don't have the
spare headspace right now to come to grips with another codebase
completely - a
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 12:43:23PM -0700, Daniel Greene - (mt) Media Temple
wrote:
> Bert,
>
> Is there any word on the status of this possible race condition?
>
> Additionally, would checking the internal web interface tickle the same
> code that could trigger this condition?
Perhaps - what yo
Bert,
Is there any word on the status of this possible race condition?
Additionally, would checking the internal web interface tickle the same code
that could trigger this condition?
Best,
--
Daniel Greene
Systems Engineer
(mt) Media Temple, Inc
877 578.4000 x515
- Original Message -
15 matches
Mail list logo