On 06/29/2011 01:16 PM, K. Haley wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 03:35 PM, walt wrote:
>> On 06/28/2011 10:20 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>>
>>> ... And, I don't like the idea of a DE [gnome] that depends so
>>> much on interpreted languages; no matter how fast your box is,
>>> there's got to be a performance hit a
On 06/28/2011 03:35 PM, walt wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 10:20 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
>
>> ... And, I don't like the idea of a DE [gnome] that depends so
>> much on interpreted languages; no matter how fast your box is,
>> there's got to be a performance hit and it adds up.
> I've not tried gnome 3 yet --
On 06/28/2011 09:02 PM, Duncan wrote:
> So if your distro has gmime 2.5, and the pan rpm you have requires 2.4,
> it's not going to work. And you can't downgrade gmime because that will
> break all the other packages on the distro depending on gmime, so your
> only viable option (if you can't b
Beartooth posted on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:12:50 + as excerpted:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:08:29 -0600, K. Haley wrote:
>
>> On 06/27/2011 12:55 PM, Duncan wrote:
>>> If I'm not mistaken,
>>>
>> Actually gmime-2.5 has been around for a while, it just hasn't been
>> released as a stable version y
On 06/28/2011 02:35 PM, walt wrote:
I've not tried gnome 3 yet -- gentoo is moving slowly towards it,
not rushing. What interpreted language do you refer to?
I gather that there's a fair amount of Java used and that the
third-party extensions are mostly (if not totally) in that language. I
On 06/28/2011 10:20 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> ... And, I don't like the idea of a DE [gnome] that depends so
> much on interpreted languages; no matter how fast your box is,
> there's got to be a performance hit and it adds up.
I've not tried gnome 3 yet -- gentoo is moving slowly towards it,
not rus
On 06/28/2011 07:05 AM, Beartooth wrote:
(Fwiw, I'll be one of those skipping F15 till Gnome 3 has changed
a bunch, or else running Xfce or even KDE 4 on it. After several days'
look, I see more new tricks than are worth this old dog's while to learn,
alas!)
I've gone to XFCE and am very happy
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:08:29 -0600, K. Haley wrote:
> On 06/27/2011 12:55 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> If I'm not mistaken, pan-0.134 didn't yet support gnome3, but there's
>> definitely support for gnome3 in khaley's git repo, and I believe it
>> made it into 0.135 as well.
>>
>> Further, even if I'm wro
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:55:41 +, Duncan wrote:
> Beartooth posted on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:22:48 + as excerpted:
>
>> I'm running Scientific Linux 6 on one machine, and getting this :
>>
>> package gmime-2.5.3-1.el6.rf.i686 (which is newer than
>> gmime-2.4.7-1.99.el6.i686) is already
On 06/27/2011 12:55 PM, Duncan wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, pan-0.134 didn't yet support gnome3, but there's
> definitely support for gnome3 in khaley's git repo, and I believe it made
> it into 0.135 as well.
>
> Further, even if I'm wrong about gmime-2.5 being a gnome3 thing, it's
> quite lik
Beartooth posted on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:22:48 + as excerpted:
> I'm running Scientific Linux 6 on one machine, and getting this :
>
> package gmime-2.5.3-1.el6.rf.i686 (which is newer than
> gmime-2.4.7-1.99.el6.i686) is already installed [root@Hbsk btth]# rpm
> -ivh pan-0.134-1.el6.rf.
11 matches
Mail list logo
