On 06/29/2011 01:16 PM, K. Haley wrote: > On 06/28/2011 03:35 PM, walt wrote: >> On 06/28/2011 10:20 AM, Joe Zeff wrote: >> >>> ... And, I don't like the idea of a DE [gnome] that depends so >>> much on interpreted languages; no matter how fast your box is, >>> there's got to be a performance hit and it adds up. >> I've not tried gnome 3 yet -- gentoo is moving slowly towards it, >> not rushing. What interpreted language do you refer to? I'm not >> aware that gnome 2.x relies on such a language. > IIRC, a lot of the interface uses javascript.
Humpf. $ls -lF /usr/share/idl drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 27 2010 bonobo-2.0/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Sep 27 2010 bonobo-activation-2.0/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Apr 4 08:36 gnome-panel-2.0/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 13 01:28 orbit-2.0/ drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40960 May 25 11:46 xulrunner-2.0/ Those sneaky gnomes adopted the mozilla interface description language without even telling me :) _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users