[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-31 Thread Ben Bullock
On Sat, 31 May 2008 23:29:58 +, Ben Bullock wrote: > On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:52:21 +, walt wrote: >> Is the above code different from yours? > I have not looked at the Subversion repository version of the program. Excuse me for following myself up. This is just a note to save some peopl

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-31 Thread Ben Bullock
On Sat, 31 May 2008 09:36:18 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > Thanx for fixing it so promptly. In fact I fixed it so promptly that I fixed it before you even posted your original message. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-31 Thread Ben Bullock
On Sat, 31 May 2008 16:52:21 +, walt wrote: > I wonder if we are using different sources because I don't see a > duplicate call there in post-ui.cc from svn and I can't reproduce the > bug: > > // apply the profiles > update_profile_combobox (); > apply_profile ();<-

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-31 Thread walt
On Sat, 31 May 2008 15:59:25 +, Ben Bullock wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > >> I've just installed and started using Pan. For the most part, I like >> it, but there are a few, minor issues. The most obvious one has to do >> with the signature. If I tell it to

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-31 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/31/2008 Ben Bullock wrote: There is a bug in the source code whereby a function called "apply_profile" in pan/gui/post-ui.cc is called twice. I solved the problem by commenting out one of the function calls, on about line 1550: Thank you. It's odd, however, that it only popped up if a li

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-31 Thread Ben Bullock
On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > I've just installed and started using Pan. For the most part, I like > it, but there are a few, minor issues. The most obvious one has to do > with the signature. If I tell it to use a text file, it sends the > location of the file, not the

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-30 Thread walt
On Thu, 29 May 2008 22:56:12 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > A few days after opening the bug, it was consolidated with four other > reports. Examining the various comments, I learned that it only happens > if Pan has to word-wrap the signature. AHA! The first part of my sig, > the part that doesn't c

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-30 Thread Jim Henderson
On Fri, 30 May 2008 06:41:16 +, Duncan wrote: > Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, > 29 May 2008 22:56:12 -0700: > >> Thought you'd all like to know, in case somebody else has the same >> problem. > > Wow, that explains why I never saw it... I

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-29 Thread Duncan
Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 29 May 2008 22:56:12 -0700: > A few days after opening the bug, it was consolidated with four other > reports. Examining the various comments, I learned that it only happens > if Pan has to word-wrap the signature.

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-29 Thread Joe Zeff
A few days after opening the bug, it was consolidated with four other reports. Examining the various comments, I learned that it only happens if Pan has to word-wrap the signature. AHA! The first part of my sig, the part that doesn't change, gets wrapped! I changed that, so that it's now tw

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-24 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/24/2008 Travis wrote: File a bug report. Done! TYVM. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-24 Thread Travis
- Original Message - From: "Joe Zeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature > On 05/20/2008 Rhialto wrote: >> Maybe you can have your sigmonster output the time as well, when it >

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-24 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/20/2008 Rhialto wrote: Maybe you can have your sigmonster output the time as well, when it is called? Then you can (hopefully) see if both instances are called soon after each other, or maybe once before editing the post and once after. Or something. If it helps, I can see both signatur

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-21 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/21/2008 Jack Cuyler wrote: What version of pan are you using? I reported a bug (408778) on a similar issue some time early last year and it was fixed in version 0.125. I'm using version 0.132, Waxed in Black. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-u

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-21 Thread Jack Cuyler
On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > I've just installed and started using Pan. For the most part, I like > it, but there are a few, minor issues. The most obvious one has to do > with the signature. If I tell it to use a text file, it sends the > location of the file, not the

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 May 2008 15:11:09 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > Do you add extra headers by any chance? I do, because the main group > I'm on is self-moderated. Nope, no extra headers. Jim ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.o

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/20/2008 Duncan wrote: Well, the cat line is about the simplest executable solution you could get, so at least for a test, try it and see if it dups that. Similarly, you can try a text file (what I'm using with no problem) and see if it dups that. OK! Gotcha! Using cat /home/joe/Do

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Duncan
Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 20 May 2008 16:11:59 -0700: > Using cat isn't acceptable, because that means I only have one sig, not > the hundred or more I've moved over from Windows. (You'd be amazed how > many quotes you can find when you've be

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Rhialto
On Tue 20 May 2008 at 16:11:59 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > goes below it. It's possible, of course, that Pan is calling the > sigmonster twice, as there are several blank lines between them. Is > there any way to test? Maybe you can have your sigmonster output the time as well, when it is called?

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/20/2008 Duncan wrote: Try fiddling with the permissions executable bit, and/or using `cat /path/to/file/` for the command on a plain text file. Also, make sure the sig does /not/ have a sig delimiter line (properly dash dash space, "-- " on it's own line, but pan should see "--" without

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Duncan
Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 20 May 2008 15:11:09 -0700: > Jim Henderson wrote: >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Bruce Bowler wrote: >> >>> Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing >>> the message (and maybe hitt

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Joe Zeff
Jim Henderson wrote: On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Bruce Bowler wrote: Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing the message (and maybe hitting send and the group doesn't exist in the server for the selected profile). Weird, I see it with some profiles on a con

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 May 2008 16:58:28 -0400, Bruce Bowler wrote: > Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing the > message (and maybe hitting send and the group doesn't exist in the > server for the selected profile). Weird, I see it with some profiles on a consistent basis. Jim

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Joe Zeff
On 05/20/2008 Bruce Bowler wrote: Only time I've seen it is if you change the profile after composing the message (and maybe hitting send and the group doesn't exist in the server for the selected profile). I have one profile and the group has existed on the server for over a decade. Not to

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Bruce Bowler
On Tue, 20 May 2008 20:44:20 + (UTC) Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:00 -0700, Travis wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Jim Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Sent: Tuesday, > &g

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:03:00 -0700, Travis wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Jim Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Sent: Tuesday, > May 20, 2008 11:39 AM > Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature > > >> On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Travis
- Original Message - From: "Jim Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 11:39 AM Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature > On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > >> I've just installed and started using Pan. For

[Pan-users] Re: Doubled signature

2008-05-20 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 20 May 2008 11:13:22 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote: > I've just installed and started using Pan. For the most part, I like > it, but there are a few, minor issues. The most obvious one has to do > with the signature. If I tell it to use a text file, it sends the > location of the file, not the