Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 24 Oct 2006
01:20:42 +0200:
> IF the time is precise to the nanosecond, which you can't count on. You
> should count on no better than 1-second resolution, %N is probably some
> Linux extension (repeat after me: All t
On Mon 23 Oct 2006 at 23:11:59 +, Jack Cuyler wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:13:38 +, Duncan wrote:
>
> > "Jack Cuyler"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:13:43
> > +:
> >
> >> +TMP=${TMP:-/tmp}
> >> +TEMPFILE=${TMP}/panpost
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:11:59 +, Jack Cuyler wrote:
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Gosh darn it! It looks like gmane won't let me post an email address.
Ahh well. It's jjvcuyler at drunkenbastards dot com
--
Cheers,
Jack
I WILL ONLY DO THIS ONCE A YEAR
I WILL ONLY DO THIS ONCE A YEAR
I WILL ONLY
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:13:38 +, Duncan wrote:
> "Jack Cuyler"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:13:43
> +:
>
>> +TMP=${TMP:-/tmp}
>> +TEMPFILE=${TMP}/panpost.$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S%N)
>
> OK, I'm looking at this in a bit more depth n
"Jack Cuyler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:13:43
+:
> +TMP=${TMP:-/tmp}
> +TEMPFILE=${TMP}/panpost.$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S%N)
OK, I'm looking at this in a bit more depth now, and like it except that
I'm not satisfied with the safety of th
Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 11 Oct
2006 17:18:20 +0100:
> I must admit, nearly every time I do an update via MCC I spot packages
> where I ask myself just why I've got them and promise myself I'll get rid
> of them 'soon'. The trouble is, my calenda
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 16:08, Duncan wrote:
> Well, there's always the possibility of hacking pan. =8^) Even if you
> can't do C++ coding (as I can't), if it's as simple as commenting out the
> lines that add the content type and encoding headers, adding a simple // a
> couple times isn't te
On Wednesday 11 Oct 2006 16:08, Duncan wrote:
> Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 11 Oct 2006
>
> 01:57:57 +0100:
> I hadn't realized that UUE is being deprecated out entirely, as seems to
> be the case with knode and Thunderbird, but it's not surprisin
"Jack Cuyler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:20:12
+:
> I don't care, as long as it works. :) It's released under the Aleister
> Crowley Fictional Licence - "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the
> Law."
Thanks. I've a couple day
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 11 Oct 2006
01:57:57 +0100:
> I've done a little testing with mime/base64 and as you say, it's a
> non-starter.
>
> Manually adding the headers doesn't work as pan over rides the
> Content-Type & Content-Transfer-Encodin
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 10:02, Duncan wrote:
> The reason it isn't a choice for pan-attach(-kd) is due to the way the
> standards are implemented. It's a full framework, defining a specific
> header (MIME-Version: 1.0) that must appear in any MIME compliant message,
> with additional headers de
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:37:53 +, Duncan wrote:
> There remains the question of copyright and licensing, especially
> relevant as the issues surrounding the GPLv3 update make news. For greatest
> flexibility, I'd prefer you assign copyright to me (reserving use for
> yourself of course). Basica
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 10:02, Duncan wrote:
> AFAIK, neither Thunderbird nor KNode (nor OE for that matter) do yEnc.
Sorry, I didn't make it clear I tried both yEnc and UUE with the same results.
> yEnc (My Encoding, without the M and abbreviating encoding as enc, that's
> the proper capitali
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Oct 2006
01:02:38 +0100:
> On Saturday 07 October 2006 11:45, Duncan wrote:
>> pan-attach and pan-attach-kd are scripts designed to allow posting
>> attachments with pan. URL below.
>
> Duncan, I had some comments fr
"Jack Cuyler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:13:43
+:
>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:00:17 +, Jack Cuyler wrote:
>>
>>> This patch will strip out the sig and add it back in at the end
>>> (although the latter part is commented out, as I'm
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:16:30 +, Jack Cuyler wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:00:17 +, Jack Cuyler wrote:
>
>> This patch will strip out the sig and add it back in at the end (although
>> the latter part is commented out, as I'm not sure if that will break
>> anything)
>
> And looks like I
On Sunday 08 October 2006 17:16, Jack Cuyler wrote:
> Other than that, it should work. The first sed statement will return
> everything before the first line beginning with "-- " The second sed
> statement will return the first line beginning with "-- " and
> everything after. The carrots will t
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:00:17 +, Jack Cuyler wrote:
> This patch will strip out the sig and add it back in at the end (although
> the latter part is commented out, as I'm not sure if that will break
> anything)
And looks like I found a typo. Two, actually.
> +sed -n -e '1,/-- /p' ${TEMPFILE}
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:28:51 +, Duncan wrote:
> As for putting it elsewhere in the file, it would be possible, but more
> difficult and therefore more prone to bugs. At present, the script simply
> appends the attachment output from uuenview to the end of the file --
> pretty simple and hard
Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct
2006 13:27:46 +0100:
> As you suggest, perhaps we could have full binary posting in Pan in 2.0.
> But is there sense in "reinventing the wheel"? Couldn't Pan just use
> newspost?
Well, consider that pan is a pr
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct 2006
15:46:09 +0100:
>> > Is there a way to insert the encoded file before the sig? Pan refuses
>> > to post the article stating the sig is way to0 big. No real
>> > problem though.
>>
>> It /should/ be a (GN
On Sunday 08 October 2006 11:28, Duncan wrote:
> Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct 2006
>
> 01:15:12 +0100:
> > Excellent!
> >
> > Just tried it with an attachment in uu and yenc format and both worked
> > just fine after editing and moving my sig
On Sunday 08 October 2006 11:28 am, Duncan wrote:
> Another idea I have now that I got this one down, is creating a
> front-end to newspost. Both KDE and GNOME formerly had frontends
> (knewspost and gnewspost, respectively), but AFAIK they are both
> /years/ out of date, and no one with the skil
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 08 Oct 2006
01:15:12 +0100:
> Excellent!
>
> Just tried it with an attachment in uu and yenc format and both worked
> just fine after editing and moving my sig.
yenc? I take it you are still using pan 0.14? yenc fail
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006 15:47:48 + (UTC)
Duncan wrote:
> Well, assuming you have KDE installed... it shouldn't be that hard.
> Download the script, check it if you don't trust me, put it in your
> path somewhere (I have mine in ~/bin, my regular user's bin dir,
> which is my path), and set it exec
Steve Jeppesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 07 Oct
2006 07:10:25 -0500:
> I would like to try pan-attach-kd, but since I have to ask how do I use
> it - maybe I shouldn't be asking? LOL
Well, assuming you have KDE installed... it shouldn't be that hard.
26 matches
Mail list logo
