On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:37:53 +0000, Duncan wrote:
> There remains the question of copyright and licensing, especially
> relevant as the issues surrounding the GPLv3 update make news. For greatest
> flexibility, I'd prefer you assign copyright to me (reserving use for
> yourself of course). Basically, I'm thinking Creative Commons
> Attribution/Share-alike is more appropriate for scripts than GPL, tho I'd
> probably keep it dual-licensed GPL as well in ordered to be crystal clear
> on license compatibility with the packages it relies on (tho I don't
> believe script usage would likely fall under "derived code" here in the
> US, but IANAL and it plausibly could in some legal locales). I'm not
> interested in any slaveryware exceptions at all, but keeping
> the flexibility to choose freedomware license without worrying about
> infringing the rights of others holding copyright would be useful.
>
> Or if you simply don't care, just say it's released into the public domain
> and be done with it.
I don't care, as long as it works. :) It's released under the Aleister
Crowley Fictional Licence - "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the
Law."
--
Cheers,
Jack
I WILL NOT GREASE THE MONKEY BARS
I WILL NOT GREASE THE MONKEY BARS
I WILL NOT GREASE THE MONKEY BARS
I WILL NOT GREASE THE MONKEY BARS
Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 7F17
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
