On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:04:20 +, Matej Cepl wrote:
[snipperoo]
> c) don't plan Great Changes at all anyway; I think that unfortunately
> whole idea of newsgroups got much less popular lately and people seem to
> prefer such idiotical places for communication as web-fora, facebooks
> an
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:27:12 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
> I've gotten my git account refreshed at gnome.org and have started
> committing changes for 0.134. :)
Best news in ages! Strength to your arm!
[snipperoo : technicalia over my head]
[snipperee]
> Another model,
Hi!
Duncan, Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:09:40 + (UTC):
> Jeff Berman posted on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:33:44 -0700 as excerpted:
>
> > Hey, didn't someone put together a documentation wiki of sorts for Pan?
> > Seems that would be the place to put it. And if Pan's "About" window
> > linked to the wiki,
Jeff Berman, Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:45:16 -0700:
> I'm surprised there hasn't been more uptake by others in fixing bugs and
> adding features. In my mind Pan is the best newsreader out there. I
> wonder what news reader all the Linux-using C++ developers are using
> (and contributing to)?
slrn? ema
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:59:13 +, Duncan wrote:
> I know I'm late to the party, it's already done and everyone's gone
> home, so to speak, but a couple thoughts, anyway...
Same here - it does strike me that the new 0.13x series is a complete
rewrite, let's not completely rewrite pan again in a
On 09/29/2009 03:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
Steven D'Aprano posted on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:11:01 +1000 as excerpted:
Separation of the back-end from the front-end is a perfectly sensible
idea. It's only the use of Java as the default front-end which I object
to.
2) (More in general.) Now I /did/
Jeff Berman posted on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:33:44 -0700 as excerpted:
> Hey, didn't someone put together a documentation wiki of sorts for Pan?
> Seems that would be the place to put it. And if Pan's "About" window
> linked to the wiki, that would be nice.
Yes, I strongly agree and in fact was jus
Steven D'Aprano posted on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:11:01 +1000 as excerpted:
> Separation of the back-end from the front-end is a perfectly sensible
> idea. It's only the use of Java as the default front-end which I object
> to.
I know I'm late to the party, it's already done and everyone's gone home,
walt, Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:45:50 -0700:
> So -- why not implement the pan GUI in java and let each platform deal
> with the optimized c++ part in its own way (already done)?
Because it is insane ... show me one nice Java GUI program which isn't an
insane memory hog.
Do you remember those days whe
On 09/28/2009 08:41 PM, walt wrote:
On 09/28/2009 05:39 PM, Charles Kerr wrote:
On 09/28/2009 06:45 PM, walt wrote:
So -- why not implement the pan GUI in java and let each platform
deal with the optimized c++ part in its own way (already done)?
All other factors aside, I think any Big Under
On 09/28/2009 05:39 PM, Charles Kerr wrote:
On 09/28/2009 06:45 PM, walt wrote:
So -- why not implement the pan GUI in java and let each platform
deal with the optimized c++ part in its own way (already done)?
All other factors aside, I think any Big Undertaking in Pan is
a risky move at this
On 09/28/2009 06:45 PM, walt wrote:
So -- why not implement the pan GUI in java and let each platform
deal with the optimized c++ part in its own way (already done)?
All other factors aside, I think any Big Undertaking in Pan is
a risky move at this point... and rewriting the GUI in Java is
a
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:11 +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:45:50 am walt wrote:
> > The 'infrastructure' I keep referring to has to do only with the
> > GUI interface of pan. The critical parts that you (Charles) have
> > spent so much effort in optimizing for speed and mem
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:45:50 am walt wrote:
> The 'infrastructure' I keep referring to has to do only with the
> GUI interface of pan. The critical parts that you (Charles) have
> spent so much effort in optimizing for speed and memory use, are
> all in c++, am I right?
>
> So -- why not implement
On 09/28/2009 04:25 PM, walt wrote:
Replying to myself, with an idea that struck me mere milliseconds
after hitting the 'send' button, as usual:
Another poster made a similar observation about recruiting the
OS X crowd to help out -- to which I would add the talented folk
in the kde camp. But h
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:36:58 -0700, walt wrote:
> On 09/28/2009 01:27 PM, Charles Kerr wrote:
>> I've gotten my git account refreshed at gnome.org and have started
>> committing changes for 0.134. :)
>
> Wow, cheers, and welcome back! I do believe even Duncan was beginning
> to despair of seeing
16 matches
Mail list logo
