On 09/29/2009 03:59 AM, Duncan wrote:
Steven D'Aprano posted on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 10:11:01 +1000 as excerpted:
Separation of the back-end from the front-end is a perfectly sensible
idea. It's only the use of Java as the default front-end which I object
to.
2) (More in general.) Now I /did/ note recently that transmission is
multi-frontended, with a qt and ncurses frontends among others...
You're right, that sounds like a better open-source approach for a
project given the available tools.
Charles, I'm assuming that you concentrated on the gtk front-end for
transmission, and other people built the others, is that right? If
so, I'm curious how this kind of cross-team development comes about.
Who's idea was it?
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
