[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-10-02 Thread walt
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:01:55 +, Duncan wrote: > There's no blank line > between the content and the sig delimiter in the new-post case. > > Hopefully that should be easy to fix, since you've gotten all the extra > lines out, finding where to add one for /just/ the new-post case should > (hope

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-30 Thread Duncan
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:56:32 +: > Okay, I found a few more spots where extra newlines were inserted, and > this patch removes them. Give it a try with and without selecting and > see what you think. Do you want *no* blank l

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-29 Thread Duncan
Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:47:01 -0400: > Bug 554178 – extra carriage returns above sig: this is in Pan > 0-120-0.133 Thanks. Just got around to CCing myself, adding a link to this thread. I also mentioned the test patc

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-29 Thread Duncan
Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:12:34 -0400: > Wow. With regard to the extra newlines, a single newline/blank would be > my preference. I'll see about rolling a new build either later tonight > or tomorrow. Am just too beat to d

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-29 Thread Kurt Schilling
walt wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:00:47 +, Duncan wrote: > >> So it looks to me like Charles was inserted blank lines to fix a bug of >> /no/ blank lines before or after the insertion point line, but those >> could be removed if the real bug, the differing behaviour if one selects >> to quo

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-29 Thread walt
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:00:47 +, Duncan wrote: > So it looks to me like Charles was inserted blank lines to fix a bug of > /no/ blank lines before or after the insertion point line, but those > could be removed if the real bug, the differing behaviour if one selects > to quote vs simply quoting

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread Duncan
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:17:06 +: > It was easy to eliminate the extra newline above the sig, but I notice > now that pan leaves too many blank line above my reply, at least for my > personal taste. The sig "standard" says das

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread Kurt Schilling
walt wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:47:01 -0400, Kurt Schilling wrote: > >> Filed bug report with Bugzilla. >> >> Bug 554178 – extra carriage returns above sig: this is in Pan >> 0-120-0.133 > > > > It was easy to eliminate the extra newline above the sig, but I notice > now that pan leaves to

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread walt
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:47:01 -0400, Kurt Schilling wrote: > Filed bug report with Bugzilla. > > Bug 554178 – extra carriage returns above sig: this is in Pan > 0-120-0.133 It was easy to eliminate the extra newline above the sig, but I notice now that pan leaves too many blank line above my re

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread Kurt Schilling
Kurt Schilling wrote: > Duncan wrote: >> Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 27 Sep >> 2008 08:26:03 -0400: >> > You could play around with the various sig type options. It has been > awhile since I tried that and I only tried the two t

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-27 Thread Kurt Schilling
Duncan wrote: > Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 27 Sep > 2008 08:26:03 -0400: > You could play around with the various sig type options. It has been awhile since I tried that and I only tried the two text options (FWIW I use

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-27 Thread Duncan
Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:26:03 -0400: >>> You could play around with the various sig type options. It has been >>> awhile since I tried that and I only tried the two text options (FWIW >>> I use text file, now), but that

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-27 Thread Kurt Schilling
Kurt Schilling wrote: > Duncan wrote: >> Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 26 Sep >> 2008 07:44:05 -0400: >> >>> I use 0.133 on both a Windows box and my Linux box. I currently >>> subscribe to three server feeds. Two are private servers, the

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-26 Thread Kurt Schilling
Duncan wrote: > Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 26 Sep > 2008 07:44:05 -0400: > >> I use 0.133 on both a Windows box and my Linux box. I currently >> subscribe to three server feeds. Two are private servers, the third is >> Motzarella. I hav

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-26 Thread Duncan
Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 26 Sep 2008 07:44:05 -0400: > I use 0.133 on both a Windows box and my Linux box. I currently > subscribe to three server feeds. Two are private servers, the third is > Motzarella. I have noted that as I switch