On 11/29/06, Maurice Batey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, although that might well do the trick, it's far too convoluted for me,
and anyway I don't have the incentive to make life more difficult when I can
rely on good old 'old' Pan!
Personally, I use the old 0.14.2-stable branch of Pan (c
good work, hope you can stamp out the last few bugs.
Kelly Martin
www.redbeet.com -> my home page
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
I've been compiling every release for the past month or so. Using
0.107 now. Two tiny requests (the first might be considered a bug) :
(1) When I save attachments, there isn't a "saved" icon anymore...
this existed in the old Pan, and without that icon it's very difficult
to know which attachment
On 7/31/06, David Sewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've just successfully compiled and run Pan 0.105 on a different
machine, just by running "./configure" and "make" (success on a new G5
iMac, failure on an older G4 iBook). So there must be some difference
between the two systems that is prevent
I got pan 0.103 working on OS X today. It looks pretty nice and I am
liking it. Just a couple of comments from my first hour of use, mostly
with binary attachments.
The shrink-to-fit capability for viewing picture attachments is awesome.
Couple of suggestions too. I noticed that the disk icon do
Has anyone got screenshots of the latest beta? Does it look much
different? I have been using Pan for some time on OS X with X11, the
old version from 2003. I've just joined this mailing list after seeing
today that Pan is in active development again. I apologize for not
having more background inf