On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 07:08:12 +, Duncan wrote:
> David WE Roberts posted on Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:31:33 + as excerpted:
>
>> I can ignore the author by:
>>
>> (1) Unwatch thread and rescore
>>
>> (2) Ignore author and rescore
>>
>> (3)
I tend to keep a few watched threads at the top of my header pane.
If an entity posts to that thread and I decide to ignore the author, PAN
tells me there is already a rule applied to the message (well, of course -
it is part of a watched thread).
I can ignore the author by:
(1) Unwatch thread
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:38:12 +, Duncan wrote:
> David WE Roberts posted on Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:47:47 + as excerpted:
>
>> Is there any way to change the time format in the Header pane from 12
>> to 24 hour format?
>
> Not AFAIK, but I like the feature request! =
Is there any way to change the time format in the Header pane from 12 to
24 hour format?
Cheers
Dave R
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
On my system, if I ignore a particularly annoying author then any threads
started by this author are not properly threaded - they appear 'orphaned'.
I can see that if the original post is thrown then there is no obvious
point to hang the threads on but this does make the whole ordering thing
qu
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:11:17 -0700, Steve Graham wrote:
> I can subscribe to a group and I will see the headers. However, when I
> go to subscribe to another one, the first group disappears from the
> subscribed group list.
>
> How do I fix that?
I have a 'feature' in Pan where if I even look
Some time ago I asked for help in getting Pan to approximate the sorting
strategy of OE/Windows Mail.
i.e. all watched threads at the top in date order newest first, then all
unwatched threads in date order newest first.
Eventually I was shown that if, after selecting a NG from the Group pane I
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 06:23:13 +, Duncan wrote:
> David WE Roberts posted on Fri, 01 Feb 2013 20:41:10 + as excerpted:
>
>> Something that I still find counter-intuitive but at least now I can
>> get the result I was seeking.
>
> Very cool. =:^) And I learned that
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:43:03 +, Duncan wrote:
> David WE Roberts posted on Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:02:06 + as excerpted:
>
>> Yep - just tested a bit further.
>> For each numeric score, when sorted on score, the threads are sorted in
>> date order oldest first.
>
"Joe Zeff" wrote in message
news:5105a24d.6080...@zeff.us...
On 01/27/2013 01:00 PM, David WE Roberts wrote:
I still don't understand why the latest threads want to snuggle up next
to
the negative scores instead of the positive scores.
Sorting on several fields can be q
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:06:12 +, David WE Roberts wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:03:25 +, Duncan wrote:
>
>> David WE Roberts posted on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:42:30 + as
>> excerpted:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:51:12 +, David WE Roberts wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:06:12 +, David WE Roberts wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:03:25 +, Duncan wrote:
>
>> David WE Roberts posted on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:42:30 + as
>> excerpted:
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:51:12 +, David WE Roberts wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:03:25 +, Duncan wrote:
> David WE Roberts posted on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:42:30 + as excerpted:
>
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:51:12 +0000, David WE Roberts wrote:
>>
>>> Now fixed email address (I hope).
>>> "David WE Robe
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:51:12 +, David WE Roberts wrote:
> Now fixed email address (I hope).
> "David WE Roberts"
> wrote in message news:...
>>I asked this question elsewhere and was directed here.
>>
>> I can see that I can watch threads, and also (wi
Now fixed email address (I hope).
"David WE Roberts" wrote in message news:...
I asked this question elsewhere and was directed here.
I can see that I can watch threads, and also (with a bit of investigation)
write a rule so that I watch any thread I start.
What I would then lik
15 matches
Mail list logo
