On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:06:12 +0000, David WE Roberts wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:03:25 +0000, Duncan wrote: > >> David WE Roberts posted on Sat, 26 Jan 2013 17:42:30 +0000 as >> excerpted: >> >>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 16:51:12 +0000, David WE Roberts wrote: >>> >>>> Now fixed email address (I hope). >>>> "David WE Roberts" <nos...@btinternet.com> >>>> wrote in message news:... >>>>>I asked this question elsewhere and was directed here. >> >> This would be the place. =:^) >> >>>>> I can see that I can watch threads, and also (with a bit of >>>>> investigation) write a rule so that I watch any thread I start. >>>>> >>>>> What I would then like to do is sort the header pane so that all the >>>>> watched threads are at the top and threaded, and then the rest of >>>>> the unwatched threads are displayed with the default behaviour i.e. >>>>> threaded and displayed in date order of start of thread. >>>>> >>>>> However in Pan if I sort on score I see the watched threads at the >>>>> top but then the other posts unthreaded below in date order of >>>>> posting (I think). >> >> Seems you figured out the threaded thing below, but FWIW, pan has a >> toggle for threaded or unthreaded. There's no threading only half the >> posts. >> >>>>> Running Pan on various Windows PCs and under Ubuntu as well. One >>>>> version is Pan 0.133 on Windows Vista 32 bit. >> >> FWIW, 0.133 is now rather old. I'm not sure how much you know about >> pan history, but Charles Kerr was the lead dev for many years, then >> eventually lost interest as he apparently doesn't do news any longer. >> He repeatedly asked for volunteers willing to take over, but they >> didn't appear right away, so for some years, pan pretty much stagnated. >> >> IIRC 0.133 was the last Charles Kerr release, a maintenance release >> integrating a security fix and a few patches to keep pan building with >> current gcc against current libs, but not much else. So even when it >> was released, little had changed even then for several years. 0.133 >> was released on August 1, 2008. > <snip> > > Don't know where that version came from - finger trouble probably. > Just upgraded to 0.135 and behaviour hasn't changed. > > Going to latest Windows version next.
Behaviour confirmed in latest version 0.139. Enhancement request logged with Bugzilla. I note that the version numbering in Bugzilla doesn't seem to match the version numbering of the Windows versions. I still don't understand why the latest threads want to snuggle up next to the negative scores instead of the positive scores. Cheers Dave R _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users