Re: [Pan-users] Pan rules/filters

2017-01-23 Thread David Kelly
-- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. On Jan 23, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Per Hedeland wrote: >> On 2017-01-23 15:35, Dave wrote: >> >> I'm not sure if th

Re: [Pan-users] complaint [gnome keyring]

2012-05-01 Thread David Kelly
I do agree that if gnome-keyring is in the default configuration that it should either be listed as a dependency, or add --disable-gkr to the default. Can't really fault the developers for not having multiple virgin machines to test build upo

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-23 Thread David Kelly
hich prompted them to have something to say. Let the other person say it their way without having to paraphrase it so the reader knows where you are jumping in. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net Whom computers would destroy, they must

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-23 Thread David Kelly
ook wants desperately to post in RTF/HTML, which only compounds the difficulty of effectively editing comments in the middle of reply quotes. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-23 Thread David Kelly
ho blindly resends this text agrees to pay David $20." Then point it out after it has been resent a dozen times. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-22 Thread David Kelly
On Mar 22, 2012, at 10:06 PM, thufir wrote: > On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:08:27 -0500, David Kelly wrote: > >> Outlook is a disease where properly formatted replies are almost >> impossible to create. > > I start to see evil MS conspiracies, except that I cannot fathom what

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-22 Thread David Kelly
nk we're a bunch of kooks and will continue to > top-post no matter how much we lecture them, because that's how Outlook and > web mail works. Yes, its easy to walk on water when the lake is only 1/2" deep. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net ===

Re: [Pan-users] Reading an HTML posting when using 'old' Pan

2012-03-22 Thread David Kelly
readers from having to work hard to understand what you are saying and how one got there from here. The less work your reader has to perform the more brain CPU cycles are available to understand what you are saying. Outlook is a disease where properly formatted replies are almost im

Re: [Pan-users] GNKSA

2011-07-04 Thread David Kelly
heir basic accounts charging extra or not offering news at all. If news clients all start being pigs in sucking bandwidth then more will drop and the only options will be paid news servers who will charge for the extra resource

Re: [Pan-users] So, what's left before 1.0?

2009-09-29 Thread David Kelly
gt; actually prevent Pan 1.0 from finally, finally coming out...? I want a "DWIM" button for "Do What I Meant (not what I said)". :-) -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net Whom computers

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Problems unraring archives downloaded with PAN.

2009-03-19 Thread David Kelly
acOS X. Yet I still supplement with Terminal.app on Mac. You know that one can mount a .iso file by double-clicking in MacOS X? Clearly the solution to mounting .iso files is for everyone to run MacOS X. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net ==

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Problems unraring archives downloaded with PAN.

2009-03-18 Thread David Kelly
about which and what bloat of various Linux distributions has been installed. And its especially not safe to assume Linux. Linux-free since 1995! (since 0.99pl13) -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net Whom computers would

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Problems unraring archives downloaded with PAN.

2009-03-18 Thread David Kelly
command line parser. You have to escape the * wildcard filename to tell it what to extract. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@hiwaay.net Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: GNU/Linux Was: clearing headers?

2008-10-09 Thread David Kelly
man once taught me to watch for one of the most effective means of telling a lie: be the first to make the claim then repeat it over and over to hammer it home. People believe what they repeatedly hear without thinking. FSF does this by claiming t

Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?

2008-10-08 Thread David Kelly
ive API, an optional Linux API to allow use of unmodified Linux binaries. Portions of Linux code are lifted from Linux to implement this optional kernel module. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom comp

Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?

2008-10-07 Thread David Kelly
erver, and SVN repository. Composed and sent via MacOS X. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pan-users mailing

Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?

2008-10-06 Thread David Kelly
t;The difference between BSD and Linux is that in BSD all the kernels are different and everything else is the same. In Linux all the kernels are the same and everything else is different." -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?

2008-10-03 Thread David Kelly
f OS. Just because the reply editor puts the cursor at the top left when one opens a reply doesn't mean that is where one is to start typing. That is where one is supposed to start *editing*. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===

Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?

2008-10-03 Thread David Kelly
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 03:06:45PM +, Duncan wrote: > David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, > 03 Oct 2008 07:47:24 -0500: > > > Yes, but one problem is that those who HTML usually don't *see* the > > point

Re: [Pan-users] Re: clearing headers?

2008-10-03 Thread David Kelly
HTML even when it appears in the middle of Content-Type: text/plain. So to them it looks like pretty formatted text rather than the mess it really is. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy,

Re: [Pan-users] Re: freeze, high CPU getting new headers

2008-08-02 Thread David Kelly
On Aug 2, 2008, at 2:21 AM, Duncan wrote: David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:48:25 -0500: Expect Linux has similar but FreeBSD has per-process limits on memory. Default is 512MB. So unless one has a number of pro

Re: [Pan-users] freeze, high CPU getting new headers

2008-08-01 Thread David Kelly
cache, its not sending a delete/kill request to the news server. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. __

Re: [Pan-users] Re: freeze, high CPU getting new headers

2008-08-01 Thread David Kelly
the expense of GUI updates. Guess its reconciling the list against the list stored on disk, and saving to disk. When the GUI freezes I notice about 8 MB/sec of disk activity. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build 0.133

2008-07-31 Thread David Kelly
On Jul 31, 2008, at 9:09 PM, Kurt Schilling wrote: David Kelly wrote: For FreeBSD in the /usr/ports/news/pan directory change 0.132 to 0.133 and PORTREVISION=0 in Makefile, "rm distinfo", and then the normal FreeBSD portupgrade or whatever you use will work. It will even dow

Re: [Pan-users] Win32 build 0.133

2008-07-31 Thread David Kelly
er you use will work. It will even download the correct file from rebelbase. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pa

Re: Re;re:[Pan-users] HeyPanfins, check my headers

2008-07-31 Thread David Kelly
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:07:09AM -0400, Kurt Schilling wrote: > > As best I can tell all of the dependencies (-dev) packages have been > installed. > > And then my cousin David Kelly (and how's that for a small world?) > wrote: > > >You know for FreeBSD o

Re: [Pan-users] Does Pan Work Under Any Variant Of BSD?

2008-07-24 Thread David Kelly
to building on MacOS X. MacOS X is a recognized card-carrying BSD Unix. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.

Re: [Pan-users] Current Mac OSX Binary Options?

2008-07-16 Thread David Kelly
item on your OS DVD. I forget if there is an option for gcc3 vs gcc4 as my install has both. If one had to chose only one then gcc3 has had the fewest headaches. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers

[Pan-users] Save Text, saved short?

2007-06-25 Thread David Kelly
* would be short. Has anyone else observed the same? Pan 0.131 on FreeBSD 6.2 with the yencode package from http://www.yencode.org/ -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would dest

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Question around multi-server and connection errors

2006-10-24 Thread David Kelly
hat the current pan runs in 10% to 15% of the original memory footprint when dealing with groups in excess of 1E6 messages. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom compu

Re: [Pan-users] Re: ANN Pan 0.116: "Blanton's"

2006-10-14 Thread David Kelly
I expected. Then again the dates on the files at the news server might have happened to be in the same order as well. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first

Re: [Pan-users] Disk dowload slowdown

2006-10-12 Thread David Kelly
On Oct 12, 2006, at 7:49 PM, fred wrote: David Kelly wrote: Doesn't matter if par2 is cranking its heart out at 25 MB/sec at the same time as pan is downloading. Pan actually slows par2 which will usually run at disk speed if it has the drive to itself. I neglected to mention that th

Re: [Pan-users] Disk dowload slowdown

2006-10-12 Thread David Kelly
s the drive to itself. Have noticed surfing news in pan while downloading can slow download. Single P4-2.8GHz with HT disabled. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first driv

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Mutlipart posts?

2006-10-04 Thread David Kelly
rest of the multi-part. Could not do this on postings which pan found all headers. When the headers were incomplete and pan stopped on an existing header which lacked a body I could click the + sign to open it up, delete the red-x'ed header, and continue. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Mutlipart posts?

2006-10-01 Thread David Kelly
ology). So in summary, it looks nice but isn't much good if *I* can't figure out the GUI. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Some remarks about the user interface

2006-09-29 Thread David Kelly
The end result is the same, its just that click-drag is simpler and widely implemented elsewhere, including most places in old-pan. IIRC click-drag does not work in old pan's Task Manager list. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROT

Re: [Pan-users] 0.114 memory usage

2006-09-27 Thread David Kelly
0.14.2.91 and find 2e6 to 2.5e6 messages was about the limit with a 2GB process size limit. 0.114 is two to three times more efficient. So at least one "major overhaul" has recently happened. Thanks Charles! -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL

Re: [Pan-users] Some remarks about the user interface

2006-09-27 Thread David Kelly
the bottom of the queue" does nothing, that the "oldest first" item which is always initially selected is always used no matter what. In 0.14 the task queue honored the order one selected the articles in the header listing. Bottom up, or top down, the first one clicked wa

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Some remarks about the user interface

2006-09-27 Thread David Kelly
t it on the first, and it would once again run until it hit a listed but missing article. Guessing this is how 0.114 behaves with primary and backup servers. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

Re: [Pan-users] Feature Request: Bandwidth Throttling

2006-09-18 Thread David Kelly
idth limit experiment. I've seen 50k bytes/sec to 120k bytes/sec per connection with some news servers. Both FreeBSD and MacOS X include ipfw as a firewall option. Within ipfw one may use dummynet for traffic shaping, including bandwidth limiting. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [

Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?

2006-09-16 Thread David Kelly
much faster and does not crash. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lis

Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?

2006-09-15 Thread David Kelly
you extract a backtrace. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://l

Re: [Pan-users] How's 0.112 working for you?

2006-09-15 Thread David Kelly
e reachable. I get a fair amount of warnings and "unreachable" and "socket errors" from pan via stderr. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. __

[Pan-users] 0.112 problems

2006-09-13 Thread David Kelly
. The task manager doesn't indicate which server(s) it is using. Reliable way to cause a core dump: Download new headers in a group at the same time delete a block of messages from the same group. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Pan-users] re: works beautifully on freebsd 6.1

2006-07-20 Thread David Kelly
the compiler looks in automatically. There is a term for this sort of behavior, "Linuxism," def'n: Unique characteristic of Linux which breaks source code on everything else. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

Re: [Pan-users] screenshots, OS X working for latest beta?

2006-07-07 Thread David Kelly
quot; from within X11.app. Am not sure why I get errors. I thought machine endianness was something that X11 took care of? Thinking it worked better before FreeBSD changed to X.org from XFree86. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Pan-users] Aggregating servers (was Re: choosing news server)

2006-07-04 Thread David Kelly
servers, at least for my purposes. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-u

Re: [Pan-users] choosing news server

2006-07-04 Thread David Kelly
hich can be found on the slower fallback server. But if I delete the fallback server how does pan deal with the header cache? Does it matter if I don't intend to download those articles? -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

Re: [Pan-users] Re: ANN: Pan 0.101 "A pulse of dying power in a clenching plastic fist."

2006-06-25 Thread David Kelly
On Jun 25, 2006, at 4:15 PM, walt wrote: Artur Jachacy wrote: On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:45:11 -0500, David Kelly wrote: Also note that I said, "localhost" and not 127.0.0.1, as I configured it as localhost, not by number, altho both should be the same. Changing the address to

Re: [Pan-users] Re: ANN: Pan 0.101 "A pulse of dying power in a clenching plastic fist."

2006-06-25 Thread David Kelly
bably best to skip formal installation/removal/installation each week. Is that a mistake? Does it need to put stuff other than where its built in order to run properly? -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==

Re: [Pan-users] Pan 0.100

2006-06-12 Thread David Kelly
this demonstrates he has his priorities in order. :-) -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Coming April 1: Pan 0.90

2006-03-28 Thread David Kelly
be called porti-potti, given the undisguised opinion of the OS by folks such as myself. =8^P If the name is to be changed to something other than pan3 or similar, I lean toward "lid" as in "how do you top a pan?" With a lid of course. -- David

Re: [Pan-users] Coming April 1: Pan 0.90

2006-03-27 Thread David Kelly
pan++ or panxx? How about lid, pot or kettle? :-) -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-u

Re: [Pan-users] pan2 problems on freebsd 6.0

2005-09-11 Thread David Kelly
one. Maybe to get that far ACLOCALS_FLAGS needed to be set. After finding those 3 or 4 things I tired of the effort. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they

Re: [Pan-users] pan2 problems on freebsd 6.0

2005-09-11 Thread David Kelly
As I mentioned in my previous post the FreeBSD default is 512 MB per process. Pan2 0.14.2.91 will hit that at about 700k headers. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they

Re: [Pan-users] pan2 problems on freebsd 6.0

2005-09-10 Thread David Kelly
tions MAXDSIZ=(1024UL*1024*1024*2)# 2GB options MAXSSIZ=(128UL*1024*1024) options DFLDSIZ=(1024UL*1024*1024*2)# 2GB -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first driv

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Starting Pan?

2005-06-11 Thread David Kelly
ly *then* remove the stopped task from the queue. -- David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-