On Aug 1, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/01/2008 Travis wrote:
My guess is not enough memory.
If 1 Gig isn't enough memory, why am I, with only 256 Meg not
having any issues?
IMO the single most greatest thing about the current generation of
pan has been the huge increase in memory efficiency. Some large
newsgroups used to push pan's memory image over 1.5GB. The FreeBSD
default maximum process size is 512MB and had to be increased
because a lot of newsgroups exceeded that limit.
Learned in the old pan to "delete" messages I wasn't interested in so
as to make room for new incoming.
With the current pan I have left the FreeBSD maximum process size at
512MB, no longer "delete" messages, only mark them as read, and no
longer have any memory issues.
I say "delete" because its only removed from pan's cache, its not
sending a delete/kill request to the news server.
--
David Kelly N4HHE, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
========================================================================
Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
