On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 03:56:53 +, thufir wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 02:15:55 +, Duncan wrote:
>
>
>> The other possibility... you DID double-check to ensure that you're
>> running at the same desktop resolution, right? If you're running a
>> lower resolution, then things will be bigger
Duncan posted on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:24:30 + as excerpted:
> Heinrich Müller posted on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:23:16 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> Am 01.10.2012 11:26, schrieb Duncan:
>>> (Rant about systrays ;) . snip .
>> I'm with you. Fix pushed to master. Could you check if it fits your
>>
thufir posted on Wed, 03 Oct 2012 06:36:37 + as excerpted:
> At first the additional columns were squished to, I guess, a zero width,
> but by stretching or shrinking the first column other columns then
> became visible. Weird.
I've seen that a few times too (but not that I recall with pan),