> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > libgtk2.0-dev : Depends: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.20) but it is not going
> > to be installed
> > Depends: libcairo2-dev (>= 1.6.4-6.1) but it is not
> > going to be installed E: Broken packages
> >
> Well, I have to admit that
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:51:48 -0700, Ant wrote:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libgtk2.0-dev : Depends: libpango1.0-dev (>= 1.20) but it is not going
> to be installed
> Depends: libcairo2-dev (>= 1.6.4-6.1) but it is not
> going to be installed E: Broken packa
> > Hmm, it won't let me install libgtk2.0-dev and its dependencies:
> > # apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev libcairo2-dev libcairo2
> > libpixman-1-dev libpixman-1-0
>
> I don't understand why you're trying to put the dependencies on the
> command line (that's apt-get's job). What h
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:22:10 -0700, Ant wrote:
> Hmm, it won't let me install libgtk2.0-dev and its dependencies:
> # apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev libpango1.0-dev libcairo2-dev libcairo2
> libpixman-1-dev libpixman-1-0
I don't understand why you're trying to put the dependencies on the
command
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 19:11:26 +, Bob wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 06:42:00 -0700, dos4ever wrote:
>
>> On 06/30/2012 02:27 AM, Heinrich Müller wrote:
>>> Am Fri, 29 Jun 2012 06:45:43 -0700 schrieb dos4ever:
>>>
Hello I am a long time user of Pan and recently installed Mint Debian
LMD
...
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 2.17.6... no *** Could not run GLIB test
> > program, checking why...
> > *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log
> > for the
> > *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly
> > installed.
> >
> > I sa
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:02:34 -0700, Ant wrote:
>> It looks like the ./configure has a bug! ...
>
> FYI, I added it to Pan's bug tracker:
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679227
Sorry, you're right. I had misunderstood.
___
Pan-users maili
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 10:30:24 -0700, Ant wrote:
> It looks like the ./configure has a bug! I installed intltool package
> and got farther, but it now mentions my GLIB:
>
No, that's just how it works. When it finds something missing that it
can't do without, it quits, so it's an iterative process
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 10:30:24AM -0700, Ant wrote:
> > > line 5219: intltool-update: command not found checking for intltool >=
> > > 0.40.6... found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need
> > > intltool 0.40.6 or later.
> > >
> > > $ apt-cache search intltool intltool-debian -
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 22:31:42 -0700, Ant wrote:
>> >> > Is it me or does Pan v0.133 (yes, that old but it was from Debian
>> >> > stable) not have post message's attachment feature? I can't seem
>> >> > to find it. :(
>> >>
>> >> AFAIK it doesn't have that feature.
>> >
>> > An thanks. I am a bit
Oh frak! Sorry about that. I meant to say v0.139. I will fix that in my
future posts. Too many versions!! :(
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 05:29:53PM +, David Shochat wrote:
> Also, I'm confused by your subject line. I thought the point was to build
> 0.136 (or higher) from source (or get it some
> > line 5219: intltool-update: command not found checking for intltool >=
> > 0.40.6... found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need
> > intltool 0.40.6 or later.
> >
> > $ apt-cache search intltool intltool-debian - Help i18n of RFC822
> > compliant config files intltool - Utilit
Also, I'm confused by your subject line. I thought the point was to build
0.136 (or higher) from source (or get it some other way), so as to get
the post attachment feature that you wanted in the first place.
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongn
On Sun, 01 Jul 2012 09:48:35 -0700, Ant wrote:
> line 5219: intltool-update: command not found checking for intltool >=
> 0.40.6... found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need
> intltool 0.40.6 or later.
>
> $ apt-cache search intltool intltool-debian - Help i18n of RFC822
> comp
> >> Well, there is at least one other option: You can grab the source and
> >> build it yourself. People here can help you with that.
> >
> > Hmm, source will be a mess and complex.
>
> Not necessarily. The tools have matured so much over the last 20 years,
> most of the complexity is handled a
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:38:28 -0700, Ant wrote:
>> Well, there is at least one other option: You can grab the source and
>> build it yourself. People here can help you with that.
>
> Hmm, source will be a mess and complex.
Not necessarily. The tools have matured so much over the last 20 years,
Am 01.07.2012 09:36, schrieb Duncan:
David Shochat posted on Sun, 01 Jul 2012 01:30:33 + as excerpted:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:21:03 -0700, Ant wrote:
Ah! Wow, that came in late. Bummer that Debian stable is a bit behind
and I don't want to switch to testing yet. :(
Well, there is at le
David Shochat posted on Sun, 01 Jul 2012 01:30:33 + as excerpted:
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:21:03 -0700, Ant wrote:
>
>> Ah! Wow, that came in late. Bummer that Debian stable is a bit behind
>> and I don't want to switch to testing yet. :(
>
> Well, there is at least one other option: You ca
Ant posted on Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:21:03 -0700 as excerpted:
> Ah! Wow, that came in late. Bummer that Debian stable is a bit behind
> and I don't want to switch to testing yet. :(
Well stale packages come with the territory when you run a stale^h^ble
release.
(Not just Debian stale^h^hble eithe
19 matches
Mail list logo
