On 11-10-22 09:50 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
That information is called the post's "headers." Pressing H will
toggle it on or off as you need. HTH, HAND.
Yep, I note the shortcut, thank you!
John Sedore
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
h
On 11-10-22 09:45 PM, Travis wrote:
On Windows version and maybe Ubuntu also. Click View, Body Pane and
uncheck Show All Headers in Body Pane.
--
Ah, that worked fine. Thank you, Travis!
John Sedore
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
On 10/22/2011 09:39 PM, John Sedore wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Pan version .133, on Ubuntu 11.10. I've noticed that there is
a section at the top of each received post, some ten or more lines,
which offers information about where the post originated from, sort of
software the composer used, and so
-Original Message-
From: John Sedore
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 9:39 PM
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [Pan-users] Poster information section
Hi all,
I'm using Pan version .133, on Ubuntu 11.10. I've noticed that there is
a section at the top of each received post, some ten or
Hi all,
I'm using Pan version .133, on Ubuntu 11.10. I've noticed that there is
a section at the top of each received post, some ten or more lines,
which offers information about where the post originated from, sort of
software the composer used, and so forth. Not knowing what else to call
it
On 10/22/2011 03:56 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/22/2011 01:40 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
http://www.xfce.org/images/about/screenshots/4.8-1.png
That's what I want.
Either the config windows are using terms that I'm not familiar with, or
xbuntu made some changes.
Yes, and that's exactly how I have
On 10/22/2011 01:40 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
http://www.xfce.org/images/about/screenshots/4.8-1.png
That's what I want.
Either the config windows are using terms that I'm not familiar with, or
xbuntu made some changes.
Yes, and that's exactly how I have it on both my desktop and my laptop.
Th
On 10/22/2011 03:16 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/22/2011 01:01 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
I tried that, but Xfce 4.8 mandates that the panel be at the top of the
screen, and I just don't like that... It was possible in v4.6 but they
removed it.
A full-featured (i.e., the way GNOME 2 does it) panel wit
On 10/22/2011 01:01 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
I tried that, but Xfce 4.8 mandates that the panel be at the top of the
screen, and I just don't like that... It was possible in v4.6 but they
removed it.
A full-featured (i.e., the way GNOME 2 does it) panel with hierachial
"Start" button (like Window
On 10/22/2011 02:17 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 10/22/2011 09:47 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Eventually, though, as apps are rewritten to use GTK3, I'll be left
behind.
Do what I did: migrate to XFCE.
I tried that, but Xfce 4.8 mandates that the panel be at the top of the
screen, and I just don't li
On 10/22/2011 09:47 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
Eventually, though, as apps are rewritten to use GTK3, I'll be left behind.
Do what I did: migrate to XFCE.
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
On 10/22/2011 12:02 PM, Rhialto wrote:
On Sat 22 Oct 2011 at 11:47:54 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
(as opposed to unmaintained, 8yo s/w like nethack)
Hey, who says NetHack is unmaintained? The DevTeam thinks of everything! :-)
v3.4.3 was released in 2003. Maybe the DevTeam got zapped by a sw
On Sat 22 Oct 2011 at 11:47:54 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> (as opposed to unmaintained, 8yo s/w like nethack)
Hey, who says NetHack is unmaintained? The DevTeam thinks of everything! :-)
There is also something called UnNetHack which is a continuation of
development by someone else.
http://sourc
On 10/22/2011 02:40 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/22/2011 01:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719)
That's *ancient*.
If it's not broken, don'
Ron Johnson posted on Sat, 22 Oct 2011 02:16:06 -0500 as excerpted:
> Anyway, my original comment was simply, "That's *ancient*." Nothing
> more, nothing less. smtp, pop3 and mbox haven't changed in a *long*
> time, so there's no *need* to upgrade as long as your boot disk keeps
> functioning.
Ron Johnson posted on Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:31:08 -0500 as excerpted:
> On 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719)
>>>
>>> That's *ancient*.
>>
>> If it's not broken, don't break it by updating.
>>
> That's only valid i
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/22/2011 01:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719)
That's *ancient*.
If it's not broken, don't break it by updating.
That's only valid if
On 10/22/2011 01:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 10/21/2011 08:07 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719)
That's *ancient*.
If it's not broken, don't break it by updating.
That's only valid if subsequent versions
18 matches
Mail list logo
