On 07/03/11 19:22, SciFi wrote:
The actual binary data needs to be split _before_ it is encoded
(before uuencoded, before yEncoded, before MIME'd, etc.)
or in the view of the end-user/downloader, _after_ decoding.
Well, normally the uploader does that by rar-ing and splitting the files
he wants
On 07/03/2011 10:27 AM, Heinrich Mueller wrote:
On 07/03/11 13:03, Duncan wrote:
Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
was more to the commit but this is the pertinent part for us):
[snip]
B
After reading your email, I've come to the conclusion that Windows Live
Mail wins the Horrible Net Keeping Seal of Approval for the abominable
way that it quotes in reply messages.
(Yes, I top-posted, bit since I'm changing topic, that's OK.)
On 07/03/2011 01:35 PM, Travis wrote:
-Origi
Alan Meyer posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 11:27:25 -0700 as excerpted:
> I'd be in favor of keeping the GNKSA seal of approval and, as some
> others have said, four connections is plenty for me.
>
> I'd also be curious to know where the knee of the curve is on
> connections. Even assuming infinite c
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 02:04:28 +, Duncan wrote:
> FWIW, while I'm gradually getting more comfortable with git, since I'm on
> Gentoo I was able to "cheat" on this, by looking at what the gentoo
> git-2.eclass ebuild helper library did.
Never occurred to me to read it, but I woulda-coulda-should
Heinrich Mueller posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:27:36 +0200 as excerpted:
> On 07/03/11 13:03, Duncan wrote:
>> Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
>> history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
>> was more to the commit but this is the pe
Heinrich Mueller posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:17:08 +0200 as excerpted:
> Should be this:
> https://github.com/imhotep82/pan2/tree/merge_with_lostcoder_testing.
OK, thanks. =:^)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use th
On 07/03/2011 12:54 PM, Rob wrote:
Maybe the spec could be updated. Maybe it's time for it to
just be retired.
A little bit of work found an email address for one of the (then)
maintainers, j...@gnksa.org. I've sent an email asking for feedback on
this subject and will act as a liaison betw
On Sunday 03 July 2011 14:02, Joe Zeff wrote:
> I agree about keeping the GNKSA stamp, but have a
> question: how old is the GNKSA standard, and how long has it been since
> it's been updated?
GNKSA 2.0 is the latest version, and hasn't been updated since 2003. The
last evaluation they have on
-Original Message-
From: Alan Meyer
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 11:27 AM
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
I'd be in favor of keeping the GNKSA seal of approval and, as
some others have said, four connections is plenty for me.
I'd also be curious
I'd be in favor of keeping the GNKSA seal of approval and, as
some others have said, four connections is plenty for me.
I'd also be curious to know where the knee of the curve is on
connections. Even assuming infinite capacity computers, there
are still potentially two throttles in place on downl
-Original Message-
From: George Czerw
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:01 AM
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
On Sunday, July 03, 2011 10:37:03 am Travis wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Duncan
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 4:03 AM
To: pan-use
On 07/03/2011 08:01 AM, George Czerw wrote:
I agree with Travis, keep the GNKSA stamp.
I can't imagine why anyone would really NEED more than 4 connections.
I only use Pan for text groups, so I've no need for multiple
connections. I agree about keeping the GNKSA stamp, but have a
question: h
Hi,
I'm contemplating the file-upload feature being put into Pan.
I'm speaking for use in the way
how massive binary files are being uploaded
to the world-wide Usenet,
their actual expected formats & usages etc.
It seems this new Pan feature is doing a similar thing
that the yencee project was
On 07/03/11 12:02, Duncan wrote:
Heinrich Mueller posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:23:31 +0200 as excerpted:
On 07/03/11 01:21, Duncan wrote:
Heinrich Mueller posted on Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:24:41 +0200 as
excerpted:
Well, I did a merge, but it still gives me segfaults when I try to
delete an art
On 07/03/11 13:03, Duncan wrote:
Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
was more to the commit but this is the pertinent part for us):
commit 9f3b662bb94474c833a0c1af4d1a265e83279cd1
Author: Hein
Rhialto posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:35:32 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 13:21:27 +, Duncan wrote:
>> Rhialto posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:09:22 +0200 as excerpted:
>>
>> > On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 11:03:41 +, Duncan wrote:
>> >> So I'd prefer to keep the 4-connections GUI ca
> On Sunday, July 03, 2011 10:37:03 am Travis wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan
> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 4:03 AM
> To: pan-users@nongnu.org
> Subject: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
>
> Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
> history and G
-Original Message-
From: Duncan
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 4:03 AM
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
was more
On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 13:21:27 +, Duncan wrote:
> Rhialto posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:09:22 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 11:03:41 +, Duncan wrote:
> >> So I'd prefer to keep the 4-connections GUI cap and the 100% GNKSA seal
> >> of approval, but it's nothing I feel inc
Rhialto posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:09:22 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 11:03:41 +, Duncan wrote:
>> So I'd prefer to keep the 4-connections GUI cap and the 100% GNKSA seal
>> of approval, but it's nothing I feel incredibly strongly about,
>> certainly not like top posting or H
On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 11:03:41 +, Duncan wrote:
> So I'd prefer to keep the 4-connections GUI cap and the 100% GNKSA seal
> of approval, but it's nothing I feel incredibly strongly about, certainly
> not like top posting or HTML or the like.
I tend to agree. And it's an easy enough change to
Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
was more to the commit but this is the pertinent part for us):
commit 9f3b662bb94474c833a0c1af4d1a265e83279cd1
Author: Heinrich Müller
Date: Mon Jun 27 1
Heinrich Mueller posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 10:23:31 +0200 as excerpted:
> On 07/03/11 01:21, Duncan wrote:
>> Heinrich Mueller posted on Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:24:41 +0200 as
>> excerpted:
>>
>>> Well, I did a merge, but it still gives me segfaults when I try to
>>> delete an article. (Both the pure
On 07/03/11 01:21, Duncan wrote:
Heinrich Mueller posted on Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:24:41 +0200 as excerpted:
Well, I did a merge, but it still gives me segfaults when I try to
delete an article. (Both the pure testing branch and the merged one).
Since I haven't done the binary groups in awhile (a
25 matches
Mail list logo
