> On Sunday, July 03, 2011 10:37:03 am Travis wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Duncan > Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 4:03 AM > To: pan-users@nongnu.org > Subject: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA > > Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's > history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there > was more to the commit but this is the pertinent part for us): > > commit 9f3b662bb94474c833a0c1af4d1a265e83279cd1 > Author: Heinrich Müller <sphem...@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> > Date: Mon Jun 27 10:19:22 2011 +0200 > > [+] changed max connections to 20 > > <snip> > > The four connections limit is a MUST (not a should), listed under point > #19, "Be kind to servers, leave room for others". As a MUST, if pan > elects to change the GUI, pan fails a MUST and therefore scores an > automatic fail. 100% compliant to full fail in one commit! > > <snip> > > GNKSA is pretty specific, 4 connections max, and it's a MUST, but > there's > an existing workaround for those who want it. > > <snip> > > I vote to keep the GNKSA stamp. > As Duncan said it is very easy to modify even for a old non Linux > windows guy like me. > -- > > Travis in Shoreline Washington > > > _______________________________________________
I agree with Travis, keep the GNKSA stamp. I can't imagine why anyone would really NEED more than 4 connections. George in Noo Joisey _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
