On Fri February 25 2011, walt wrote:
>
> The 'configure' script is generated by running the 'autogen.sh' script
> in the top directory of the pan source tree.
>
> Before you can run 'autogen.sh' you must have the autogen package from
> gnu:
>
> Homepage:http://www.gnu.org/softw
On 02/25/2011 10:46 AM, John Aldrich wrote:
It appears as though the configure script for Pan may need some tweaking. It
did not auto-detect the architecture of my system (64-bit Athlon) and would
only compile once I installed the i686 version of gmime-devel.
I just checked and while I can't swe
It appears as though the configure script for Pan may need some tweaking. It
did not auto-detect the architecture of my system (64-bit Athlon) and would
only compile once I installed the i686 version of gmime-devel.
I just checked and while I can't swear that it would have worked without
the .i
On Fri February 25 2011, John Aldrich wrote:
>
> > You might want to contact the pan package maintainer for Fedora and/or
> > add the modified .spec file as an attachment to the Bugzilla entry
> > mentioned on this list.
>
> Good point. Thanks! Didn't think of that.
>
Ok. I've uploaded the mod
On Fri February 25 2011, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 08:36 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
> > Thanks. I figured it out. It was wanting the .i686 version, and when I
> > installed that, it went right through and started compiling... It's
> > compiling even as I type this.
>
> For other
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 08:36 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
> Thanks. I figured it out. It was wanting the .i686 version, and when I
> installed that, it went right through and started compiling... It's
> compiling even as I type this.
For other people trying to compile Pan on a Fedora x86_64 or i6
On Fri February 25 2011, Duncan wrote:
> John Aldrich posted on Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:40:43 -0500 as excerpted:
> > On Fri February 25 2011, David Shochat wrote:
> >> For a specific example, I have Ubuntu 10.10. On my system,
> >> gmime-2.0.pc and gmime-2.4.pc are both in /usr/lib/pkgconfig.
> >> gmi
John Aldrich posted on Fri, 25 Feb 2011 06:40:43 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Fri February 25 2011, David Shochat wrote:
>>
>> For a specific example, I have Ubuntu 10.10. On my system, gmime-2.0.pc
>> and gmime-2.4.pc are both in /usr/lib/pkgconfig. gmime-2.0.pc comes
>> from package libgmime-2.0-2-
On Fri February 25 2011, David Shochat wrote:
>
> For a specific example, I have Ubuntu 10.10. On my system, gmime-2.0.pc
> and gmime-2.4.pc are both in /usr/lib/pkgconfig. gmime-2.0.pc comes from
> package libgmime-2.0-2-dev and gmime-2.4.pc comes from libgmime-2.4-dev,
> consistent with what Dun
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 05:50:58 -0500, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Thu February 24 2011, Duncan wrote:
>>
>> Many binary distributions package the developer bits of a package
>> separately, since users not compiling anything on their own won't need
>> them. Do you have a gmime-dev or similar package a
On Thu February 24 2011, Duncan wrote:
>
> Many binary distributions package the developer bits of a package
> separately, since users not compiling anything on their own won't need
> them. Do you have a gmime-dev or similar package available to install,
> that's not installed? If so, that shoul
11 matches
Mail list logo
