Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:38:54 + (UTC) Jim Henderson wrote: Hello Jim, > Yeah, that's what I remember seeing then as well. In fact, the common > usage of "/" for denoting emphasis is relatively new as I recall. See my reply to Robert. However, the short version is that *, / & _ all date to

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:03:19 + Robert Marshall wrote: Hello Robert, > I go back to the late 80's too in usenet use - I can recall a variety > of prefix characters for quoting but not *'s - they were used - as in > your reply for emphasis OP didn't mention quotes, but attributions. Not the s

[Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:03:19 +, Robert Marshall wrote: > I go back to the late 80's too in usenet use - I can recall a variety of > prefix characters for quoting but not *'s - they were used - as in your > reply for emphasis Yeah, that's what I remember seeing then as well. In fact, the comm

Re: [Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Rob
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 01:06 am, Duncan wrote: > I'd suggest that, and point at the examples of your own posts and > perhaps others from google groups as far back as they go... and then > tell him the ball is in his court. You've made your case and presented I wasn't the original poster here

[Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Robert Marshall
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Jim Henderson wrote: > On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:47:51 +, Brad Rogers wrote: > >> My usenet use goes back to about 1992, with approx ten yrs BBSing prior >> and I don't recall seeing it on Fido, or any other fido type network, >> either. > > I was thinking this was possible,

[Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Duncan
Rob posted on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:31:32 -0400 as excerpted: > But I think I'm > pretty much done with debating on Usenet by now; Of course, for some of us, this list is served as a newsgroup, via gmane. =:^) I much prefer following mailing lists as newsgroups, as opposed to mail, thus clogging

[Pan-users] Re: OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Jim Henderson
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:47:51 +, Brad Rogers wrote: > My usenet use goes back to about 1992, with approx ten yrs BBSing prior > and I don't recall seeing it on Fido, or any other fido type network, > either. I was thinking this was possible, but perhaps it could've been something before FidoN

Re: [Pan-users] OT: calling all old-timers -- using * for attributions

2009-11-03 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 00:36:03 -0400 Rob wrote: Hello Rob, > Maybe the asterisk thing was a FidoNet or other BBS-oriented form of > attribution, but I don't remember it. I have used some tty-based chat My usenet use goes back to about 1992, with approx ten yrs BBSing prior and I don't recall se