On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:03:19 +0000
Robert Marshall <rob...@capuchin.co.uk> wrote:
Hello Robert,
> I go back to the late 80's too in usenet use - I can recall a variety
> of prefix characters for quoting but not *'s - they were used - as in
> your reply for emphasis
OP didn't mention quotes, but attributions. Not the same thing. The
attribution is the bit at the top saying who wrote the bit being quoted.
As you say, "*" along with "/" and "_" were used, in pairs around words
or phrases for emphasis. Some FTN readers even did the necessary
embellishments to the text as, (LOOTAR alert) IIRC, new Pan can where "*"
represents bold, "/" italics and "_" underscored text.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad never immediately apparent"
Black man got a lot of problems, but he don't mind throwing a brick
White Riot - The Clash
_______________________________________________
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
