On Oct 7, 2008, at 5:09 PM, CSV4ME2 wrote:
First Richard S. cs. created GNU in the eighties,
than there was Linus T creating Linux in the nineties
and later on glueing GNU unto the Linux kernel giving us a nice UNIX
clone.
No, Stallman failed to create GNU. GNU was to be Stallman's OS. GCC
Joe Zeff wrote:
> Going back to the original comment
> about GNU/Linux, that claim would be more valid IMHMO if there were a
> distro calling itself "Linux" that *wasn't* using the GNU programs.
> Since there isn't, the term becomes a distinction without a difference.
Many versions of Montavista's
First Richard S. cs. created GNU in the eighties,
than there was Linus T creating Linux in the nineties
and later on glueing GNU unto the Linux kernel giving us a nice UNIX clone.
Let's be grateful they invested their time giving us such a wonderful gift,
instead of starting a religious flavoure
Beartooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 07 Oct 2008
16:27:04 +:
>> An icon color change may be useful, yes. You might wish to file a bug
>> suggesting it.
>
> Hmmm ... OK, I'll try to get to it. Starting with where and how,
> of course, but I p
On Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:34:22 +, Duncan wrote:
> Beartooth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below,
> on Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:09:27 +:
>
>> Take a look at a thread called "Why is firefox such a beast?" on
>> gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general -- it's a good exam
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:39:38 + (UTC)
Yavor Doganov wrote:
Sure, everyone is entitled to their own opinion -- I suggest you to
read the GNU/Linux FAQ for common irrational arguments of the people
who insist calling the system "Linux".
When you phrase it like that -- when
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:39:38 pm Yavor Doganov wrote:
> В Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:48:15 +1000, Steven D'Aprano написа:
> >> No, Linux is a kernel -- nothing more, nothing less.
> >
> > The GNU people have their opinion. It's not one shared by many
> > others. Possibly not shared by *any* others.
>
> Sure
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:39:38 +, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Sure, everyone is entitled to their own opinion -- I suggest you to read
> the GNU/Linux FAQ for common irrational arguments of the people who
> insist calling the system "Linux".
I've just done as you suggested, but I don't find in the F
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:39:38 + (UTC)
Yavor Doganov wrote:
>
> Sure, everyone is entitled to their own opinion -- I suggest you to
> read the GNU/Linux FAQ for common irrational arguments of the people
> who insist calling the system "Linux".
When you phrase it like that -- when your approach i
Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 07 Oct 2008
07:39:38 +:
> Oddly (or not), if you take out the linux-2.6 package from a "Linux"
> system, and replace it with FreeBSD's kernel, it runs! It is the same
> "Linux" system, but there's no Linux t
В Mon, 06 Oct 2008 23:48:15 +1000, Steven D'Aprano написа:
>> No, Linux is a kernel -- nothing more, nothing less.
>
> The GNU people have their opinion. It's not one shared by many others.
> Possibly not shared by *any* others.
Sure, everyone is entitled to their own opinion -- I suggest you to
11 matches
Mail list logo
