Joe Zeff wrote: > Going back to the original comment > about GNU/Linux, that claim would be more valid IMHMO if there were a > distro calling itself "Linux" that *wasn't* using the GNU programs. > Since there isn't, the term becomes a distinction without a difference.
Many versions of Montavista's Linux use only uclibc and busybox without any GNU software in sight. http://www.mvista.com/ GCC is the compiler, true, but it is hosted on a PC and cross-compiles for ARM. Since GCC isn't on the system running the "distro" I don't think it counts. This gets used in a lot of embedded devices. _______________________________________________ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
