On Aug 1, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 08/01/2008 Travis wrote:
My guess is not enough memory.
If 1 Gig isn't enough memory, why am I, with only 256 Meg not
having any issues?
IMO the single most greatest thing about the current generation of
pan has been the huge increase in m
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Greg Lee wrote:
That happens to me. I think it's a bug. When loading a large number
of headers, about 3/4 of the way through, the GUI loses it, and I just
have to wait until the headers from that group are loaded. Pan
will not
respond until the headers are all
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:17:22 -0700, David Shochat wrote:
> What OS, distro (if Linux), etc.? I'm wondering if it's an Ubuntu
> problem. Also, does top show pan at close to 100% during your 3 minutes?
> -- David
I have Linux, distribution Fedora Core 6, though I have
made some changes, e.g., gtk
On Aug 1, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Duncan wrote:
That could be a couple things.
First, make sure you're comparing peaches to peaches (I started to use
apples, as traditional, but when one /is/ an Apple... =8^) . Are you
comparing the same group on both machines? Suppose there's a
message (or
a r
On Aug 1, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Travis wrote:
My guess is not enough memory.
Except the machine with the problem has 1Gb and the Mac (no problem)
has only 512 Mb.
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/li
On Aug 1, 2008, at 4:56 PM, walt wrote:
I can suggest only obvious tricks such as looking at the event log and
starting pan from a command prompt using the --debug flag.
Thanks for the suggestions. The event log (which I didn't even know
about!) shows nothing bad, and does not change at a
On Aug 1, 2008, at 8:01 PM, Greg Lee wrote:
That happens to me. I think it's a bug. When loading a large number
of headers, about 3/4 of the way through, the GUI loses it, and I just
have to wait until the headers from that group are loaded. Pan will
not
respond until the headers are all l
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:39:03 -0700, David Shochat wrote:
> When getting new
> headers in a large binary group, (either as a result of entering, or
> after invoking Groups->Get Headers...), the progress indicator goes
> normally for a while (10 sec. or so) and then it stops. At this point,
> top sa
If anyone was hesitating, I thought it might help to tell you
that I just compiled version 0.133 from the subversion
repo with absolutely no issues, and I'm using it to post
this message. I'm on a Linux system (Fedora 6) with some updates,
and I had previously been using version 0.132 with a couple
David Shochat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:39:03 -0700:
> I don't know when this started happening, but it was during the 0.132
> era, so it has to be something that changed on my system. This is a
> fully-updated Ubuntu 8.04 system. I have
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Zeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] freeze, high CPU getting new headers
> On 08/01/2008 Travis wrote:
>> You have not provided enough information for me to make a guess.
> Of course, I use it f
Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:07:45
-0700:
> If 1 Gig isn't enough memory, why am I, with only 256 Meg not having any
> issues?
The groups you are viewing probably have a lot to do with it. Some
binary groups (as the OP mentioned
On 08/01/2008 Travis wrote:
You have not provided enough information for me to make a guess.
OK. I'm using a P-IV 1.8Gig processor with, as noted 256Meg RAM. I
have an nVidia video card with 128 Meg VRAM, and am using the proper
drivers. I'm running Fedora 9 with Gnome, Compiz and the desk
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Zeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] freeze, high CPU getting new headers
> On 08/01/2008 Travis wrote:
>> My guess is not enough memory.
>
> If 1 Gig isn't enough memory, why am I, with only 256 Meg
On 08/01/2008 Travis wrote:
My guess is not enough memory.
If 1 Gig isn't enough memory, why am I, with only 256 Meg not having any
issues?
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
- Original Message -
From: "David Shochat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 4:39 PM
Subject: [Pan-users] freeze, high CPU getting new headers
>I don't know when this started happening, but it was during the 0.132
>era, so it has to be something that changed on my s
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:39:03 -0700, David Shochat wrote:
> I don't know when this started happening, but it was during the 0.132
> era, so it has to be something that changed on my system. This is a
> fully-updated Ubuntu 8.04 system. I have 1Gb of memory. When getting new
> headers in a large bin
I don't know when this started happening, but it was during the 0.132
era, so it has to be something that changed on my system. This is a
fully-updated Ubuntu 8.04 system. I have 1Gb of memory. When getting
new headers in a large binary group, (either as a result of entering,
or after invok
18 matches
Mail list logo
